On Wednesday 06 June 2001 10:56, you wrote:
> Michael Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Forget it if you want; it's just an option that I came across a need for
> > yesterday (for boring reasons that I won't go in to), and I thought I may
> > as well contribute the patch that implements it, si
On 6 Jun 2001, François Pons wrote:
> > Forget it if you want; it's just an option that I came across a need for
> > yesterday (for boring reasons that I won't go in to), and I thought I may
> > as well contribute the patch that implements it, since it's such a simple
> > change.
> We will add a o
Michael Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Forget it if you want; it's just an option that I came across a need for
> yesterday (for boring reasons that I won't go in to), and I thought I may
> as well contribute the patch that implements it, since it's such a simple
> change.
We will add a onM
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Pixel wrote:
> > Is there any way to tell DrakX's auto-install mode to install LILO onto
> > /dev/hda1 instead of /dev/hda ? I've looked through the code and the
> > nearest option I can find seems to be
> well, you could use
> bootloader => { boot => 'hda1' },
Not quit
> Not possible generally as NT partition has to be formatted fat32.
>
> François.
>
NT? FAT32? Um, no? :-) NT can't read FAT32. FAT16 only, or NTFS. Win2K
can do FAT32, but NT can't.
Michael Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You can install lilo to /dev/hda1 (or other partition) instead of /dev/hda
> and then a 'standard' DOS MBR will happily boot lilo if the lilo partition
> is marked active. (Tried and tested). At the moment, DrakX will always
> overwrite a DOS MBR.
Th
Michael Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any way to tell DrakX's auto-install mode to install LILO onto
> /dev/hda1 instead of /dev/hda ? I've looked through the code and the
> nearest option I can find seems to be
well, you could use
bootloader => { boot => 'hda1' },
[...]
On 6 Jun 2001, François Pons wrote:
> > > >Is there any way to tell DrakX's auto-install mode to install LILO onto
> > > >/dev/hda1 instead of /dev/hda ? I've looked through the code and the
> > > >nearest option I can find seems to be
> > > >$o -> {bootloader}{crushMbr}
> > > >which, if set to 1
Michael Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >Is there any way to tell DrakX's auto-install mode to install LILO onto
> > >/dev/hda1 instead of /dev/hda ? I've looked through the code and the
> > >nearest option I can find seems to be
> > >$o -> {bootloader}{crushMbr}
> > >which, if set to 1, c
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Blue Lizard wrote:
> >Is there any way to tell DrakX's auto-install mode to install LILO onto
> >/dev/hda1 instead of /dev/hda ? I've looked through the code and the
> >nearest option I can find seems to be
> >$o -> {bootloader}{crushMbr}
> >which, if set to 1, causes LILO to
Michael Brown wrote:
>Is there any way to tell DrakX's auto-install mode to install LILO onto
>/dev/hda1 instead of /dev/hda ? I've looked through the code and the
>nearest option I can find seems to be
>
>$o -> {bootloader}{crushMbr}
>
>which, if set to 1, causes LILO to install onto /dev/hda b
Is there any way to tell DrakX's auto-install mode to install LILO onto
/dev/hda1 instead of /dev/hda ? I've looked through the code and the
nearest option I can find seems to be
$o -> {bootloader}{crushMbr}
which, if set to 1, causes LILO to install onto /dev/hda but if set to 0
causes LILO to
12 matches
Mail list logo
