On 15 May 2001 14:37:59 +0200, Daouda LO wrote:
> Francisco Castanheiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
take a look at Compupic (http://www.compupic.com).the linux version is
free and it is at least as powerfull as ACDSee!
bye,
Tobias
Francisco Castanheiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, i decided to make some kind of home benchmarking :-)
> System:
[...]
>
> Test: A directory with 1445 pictures (118,5Mb), all the pictures are jpg.
> PIXIE:
> Time to open the directory with the thumbnail viewer --> 33seg
> Time to crea
Well, i decided to make some kind of home benchmarking :-)
System:
AMD Thunderbird 1.2Ghz
128Mb PC100
IBM 20GB ATA66
GeForceMX with latest nvdia drivers and Twinview enabled.
OS: Mandrake 8.0, kde2.1.1
Test: A directory with 1445 pictures (118,5Mb), all the pictures are jpg.
PIXIE:
Time to open
Oh, BTW, are you using 2.1 or the 2.2 betas (or KDE CVS)?
If your using 2.1, pixie is much slower. I made the thumbnail manager faster
by an order of magnitude after KDE2.1.
On Saturday 12 May 2001 07:25 pm, you wrote:
> On Sat, 12 May 2001, Francisco Castanheiro wrote:
> > enabled).
> > Anothe
Pixie is still kindof slow at generating thumbnails, but I challenge you to
find anything faster at displaying existing ones ;-) I can load a directory
of > 2000 of them in just a few seconds.
Sorry you don't like the interface...
On Saturday 12 May 2001 07:25 pm, you wrote:
> On Sat, 12 May 2
On Sat, 12 May 2001, Francisco Castanheiro wrote:
> enabled).
> Another sad thing is that ACDSee takes less than half the time that any
> program in linux take to generate thumbnails, even with cache enabled! I just
> wanted something similar to ACDSee for linux, GQview is the best one, but
> it'
On Friday 11 May 2001 23:54, you wrote:
> May also want to check if you have preview thumbnails enabled for
> anything. A directory should show up almost immediately, but then it
> takes awhile to generate thumbnails if there are any.
That's not true, i have a directory with about 3000 files, and
May also want to check if you have preview thumbnails enabled for
anything. A directory should show up almost immediately, but then it
takes awhile to generate thumbnails if there are any.
"J . A . Magallon" wrote:
>
> On 05.12 Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> >
> > Ainsi parlait pablito :
> > > Why is
On 05.12 Guillaume Rousse wrote:
>
> Ainsi parlait pablito :
> > Why is the display of directories and folders in the KDE directory so slow
> > as compared to something like windows explorer? I thought linux was
> > supposed to be faster than windows.
> You can't determine global linux speed by
On May 11, 2001 04:44 pm, J . A . Magallon wrote:
> On 05.12 Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > Ainsi parlait pablito :
> > > Why is the display of directories and folders in the KDE directory so
> > > slow as compared to something like windows explorer? I thought linux
> > > was supposed to be faster t
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ainsi parlait pablito :
>
>> Why is the display of directories and folders in the KDE directory so slow
>> as compared to something like windows explorer? I thought linux was
>> supposed to be faster than windows.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ainsi parlait pablito :
> Why is the display of directories and folders in the KDE directory so slow
> as compared to something like windows explorer? I thought linux was
> supposed to be faster than windows.
You can't determine global linux speed by
Why is the display of directories and folders in the KDE directory so slow
as compared to something like windows explorer? I thought linux was
supposed to be faster than windows.
13 matches
Mail list logo
