Re: [Cooker] KDE2 fun

2000-09-05 Thread Denis Havlik
:~>Don't you think a report to the packager would have been as nice as well as a :~>post in Cooker? Actually, I did. However it got delayed because I am not subscribed to cooker. :~>Yup, this comes from the Netscape Pluggins that are included with kdebase. :~>This is on my list of to-dos to s

Re: [Cooker] KDE2 fun

2000-09-05 Thread Christopher Molnar
Don't you think a report to the packager would have been as nice as well as a post in Cooker? > Here come a proof that RPM-packages can actually be fun > sometimes. Guess what is required by kdebase package in cooker? > > [denis@ke RPMS]$ rpm -qp --requires kdebase-1.93-18mdk.i586.rpm|grep Xm

Re: [Cooker] KDE2 fun

2000-09-05 Thread David Faure
On Mon, 04 Sep 2000, you wrote: >KDE2 fun >(http://forum.mandrakesoft.com/article.php3?sid=2904053045) > >Here come a proof that RPM-packages can actually be fun > sometimes. Guess what is required by kdebase package in cooker? > >[denis@ke RPMS]$ rpm -qp --requires kdebase-1.93-18mdk.i586.rpm

[Cooker] KDE2 fun

2000-09-05 Thread Deno
KDE2 fun (http://forum.mandrakesoft.com/article.php3?sid=2904053045) Here come a proof that RPM-packages can actually be fun sometimes. Guess what is required by kdebase package in cooker? [denis@ke RPMS]$ rpm -qp --requires kdebase-1.93-18mdk.i586.rpm|grep Xm libXm.so.1 libXmu.so.6 So