Re: [Cooker] Konqueror isn't much good at web pages !

2000-11-26 Thread Vadim Plessky
On 25 ?? 2000 00:47, OS wrote: | | Despite all the praise lavished on it, konqueror has a long way to go yet! | yes, I agree with you. | JavaScript is decidedly hit and miss. yes. | Any pages with Flash 5 content just appear blank. | Flash 4 plugins don't load or run. | Real player

Re: [Cooker] Konqueror isn't much good at web pages !

2000-11-25 Thread Luis Alves
flash is ok in konqueror, i use it and it works ok. On Saturday 25 November 2000 04:27, you wrote: > Konquer is STILL a whole lot faster than IE and Netscape Bloatware. > I never look at java or flash crap anyway. So for me, it's quite nice. > R > _

Re: [Cooker] Konqueror isn't much good at web pages !

2000-11-24 Thread Alaric Ravenhall
Konquer is STILL a whole lot faster than IE and Netscape Bloatware. I never look at java or flash crap anyway. So for me, it's quite nice. R _ Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.ms

Re: [Cooker] Konqueror isn't much good at web pages !

2000-11-24 Thread andre
> > I find it very hard to believe that anyone seriously thinks konqueror is > better than IE 5. It not even as good as Netscape 4.76 yet !!! > Owen, it is. At least under linux. IE5 under wine has it java problems

[Cooker] Konqueror isn't much good at web pages !

2000-11-24 Thread OS
Hello, Despite all the praise lavished on it, konqueror has a long way to go yet ! JavaScript is decidedly hit and miss. Any pages with Flash 5 content just appear blank. Flash 4 plugins don't load or run. Real player is not there. It puts up the Real logo, but that's it. Fonts below about 9pt c