Norman Carver wrote:
I have a number of machines with 1.5-2GB of ram on them, and have been
running the Enterprise (himem) kernels on them (starting with MDK 8.0).
We have had no problems that I would blame on the Enterprise kernels.
In fact, the only problems we have had were memory corruption p
spontaneous reboots - replaced with 400W).
Bill Shirley
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:cooker-owner@;linux-mandrake.com]On Behalf Of Norman Carver
> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 1:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] MD
I have a number of machines with 1.5-2GB of ram on them, and have been
running the Enterprise (himem) kernels on them (starting with MDK 8.0).
We have had no problems that I would blame on the Enterprise kernels.
In fact, the only problems we have had were memory corruption problems with
MDK 8.2,
Peter Magnusson wrote:
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
Actaully it's more than that. A machine with 2GB of ram only sees this
without highmem:
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:904940 185524 719416 0 84
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 21:35, Peter Magnusson wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
> > Actaully it's more than that. A machine with 2GB of ram only sees this
> > without highmem:
> > total used free sharedbuffers cached
> > Mem:904940
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Bryan Whitehead wrote:
> Actaully it's more than that. A machine with 2GB of ram only sees this
> without highmem:
> total used free sharedbuffers cached
> Mem:904940 185524 719416 0 84 107520
> -/+ buff
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> smp and highmem, and highmem are still a little buggy, if you look at
Isnt highmem the only choice if i want to use 1024 MB RAM?
I think it would be great if MDK could do a highmem kernel also, not
just SMP + HIGHMEM kernel.
> btw. do you really n
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Buchan Milne wrote:
> No, he wants all machines (including my P133/32MB box which just runs a
> firewall) to have the overhead of highmem, just so that weird issues ( I
Fine, so install both kernels at install if the installer sees more than
1024 MB RAM. It will be more and m
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, andre wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 October 2002 16:18, Peter Magnusson wrote:
> > I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be
> > compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel.
> highmem is slower than standard so i am not for it. Besides there are other
How muc
andre wrote:
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 22:59, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
smp and highmem, and highmem are still a little buggy, if you look at
some of the posts last month, several people had problems with the
highmem kernels.
btw. do you really need the highmem kernel for 1024 MB ram? I thought
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 22:59, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> smp and highmem, and highmem are still a little buggy, if you look at
> some of the posts last month, several people had problems with the
> highmem kernels.
> btw. do you really need the highmem kernel for 1024 MB ram? I thought
> that
Peter Magnusson wrote:
I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be
compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel.
I tried this:
[root@gauss root]# rpm -ivh kernel-enterprise-2.4.18.6mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
Preparing...###
[
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Peter Magnusson wrote:
|
|
|>I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be
|>compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel.
|
|
|>There was an error when generating initrd try to do a :
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 16:18, Peter Magnusson wrote:
> I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be
> compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel.
>
highmem is slower than standard so i am not for it. Besides there are other
patchs in the case of memory<2GB
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Peter Magnusson wrote:
> I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be
> compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel.
> There was an error when generating initrd try to do a :
> /sbin/mkinitrd /boot/initrd-2.4.18-6mdkenterprise.img 2.4.18-6mdkenterprise
>
Peter Magnusson wrote:
What exactly is the difference between the enterprise kernel and the
normal kernel? Only highmem?
High mem and SMP AFAIK. It does say what the differences are during the
installation process. Might be a little bit too late for your but FYI.
-Larry
I have at least 3 boxes that have 1024 MB. I think highmem should be
compiled in, in the _default_ MDK kernel.
I tried this:
[root@gauss root]# rpm -ivh kernel-enterprise-2.4.18.6mdk-1-1mdk.i586.rpm
Preparing...###
[100%]
1:kernel-enterpr
17 matches
Mail list logo