»Gwenole Beauchesne« sagte am 2002-04-16 um 08:53:08 +0200 :
> So, you haven't looked at the RPM package.
Exactly. I only know the tar.bz2 file.
> I suppose this is already the case:
Great!
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepag
Hi,
> Well, the official binary tarball doesn't include them. No idea why
> they don't (seem to) ship them.
So, you haven't looked at the RPM package.
> No idea what you mean with "zipballs in the deepest hierarchy of the
> tarball" however ;)
I meant that:
(cd ./solver/6%{subver}/%{build_ou
»Gwenole Beauchesne« sagte am 2002-04-15 um 23:23:26 +0200 :
> Huh which KDE icons for which purpose? I remember having grabbed some
> zipballs in the deepest hierarchy of the tarball for some KDE mime
> associations and document icons. Aren't those enough?
Well, the official binary tarball doe
Hi,
> Will you also include the KDE icons which are part of the source
> package? For some strange reason, the official tar ball doesn't include
> them...
Huh which KDE icons for which purpose? I remember having grabbed some
zipballs in the deepest hierarchy of the tarball for some KDE mime
a
»Gwenole Beauchesne« sagte am 2002-04-15 um 19:58:44 +0200 :
> This cosmetic change will be carried out later as I suppose users (you :)
> want to test the package RSN. I am cleanly rebuilding it now and hopefully
> it will work out of the box. Otherwise, wait for another day.
Will you also inc
Hi,
> 2) I wanted to add/fix a few things to the wrappers and possibly fully
> rename directories to OpenOffice.org but IMHO that would become ugly.
This cosmetic change will be carried out later as I suppose users (you :)
want to test the package RSN. I am cleanly rebuilding it now and hopef
On Friday 12 April 2002 09:49 am, Brad Felmey wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 18:35, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > And please fix the missing dependency of GLIBC compiled with gcc3.x.
> >
> > What is that problem? Two things:
> > 1) Glibc is not compiled with gcc3.x, yet. But this wil
On 12 Apr 2002, Brad Felmey wrote:
> OOo installs with the libstdc++3.0, but it won't run with a GLIBC that
> isn't compiled with GCC3.0. I've verified this on 7 separate machines.
Again, there is no glibc compiled with gcc3.0 here.
> Try it. Set up an 8.1 box, and install just the updates nece
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 18:35, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > And please fix the missing dependency of GLIBC compiled with gcc3.x.
>
> What is that problem? Two things:
> 1) Glibc is not compiled with gcc3.x, yet. But this will change soon. ;-)
> 2) The Requires: libstdc++3.0 >= 3.0.4-1mdk
Hi,
> And please fix the missing dependency of GLIBC compiled with gcc3.x.
What is that problem? Two things:
1) Glibc is not compiled with gcc3.x, yet. But this will change soon. ;-)
2) The Requires: libstdc++3.0 >= 3.0.4-1mdk should be enough.
Bye,
Gwenole.
Hi,
> This is probably the last release before 1.0. Is it going to be
> appearing in cooker sometime, or should I download binaries from
> OpenOffice.org to see if my issues have been fixed?
* Tue Apr 09 2002 Gwenole Beauchesne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1.0-0.1mdk
- Update to OpenOffice.org 641d
- P
On Thu, 2002-04-11 at 14:18, Buchan Milne wrote:
> This is probably the last release before 1.0. Is it going to be
> appearing in cooker sometime, or should I download binaries from
> OpenOffice.org to see if my issues have been fixed? I would prefer not
> to download two versions of OO.o, and if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is probably the last release before 1.0. Is it going to be
appearing in cooker sometime, or should I download binaries from
OpenOffice.org to see if my issues have been fixed? I would prefer not
to download two versions of OO.o, and if it is goin
13 matches
Mail list logo
