Ldap lib issue (was Re: [Cooker] Patch for mkinitrd)

2002-12-12 Thread Brian Smith
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 21:43:00 +0200 Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Has the ldap lib on seperate /usr been sorted out? It was one of these cases ... No, it hasn't been sorted out. It is still biting me every time I try to shut down. I looked at the bug in 'zilla a week or so ago and I

Re: [Cooker] Patch for mkinitrd

2002-12-12 Thread Brian Smith
On Thu, 12 Dec 2002 10:52:18 -0800 Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Buchan, you probably already know this, but for others, there's more to worry about than just the binary: You have to start relocating libraries to /lib as well. In this case it's only one, but each case that's "only one

Re: [Cooker] Patch for mkinitrd

2002-12-12 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Todd Lyons wrote: > Buchan Milne wrote on Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 08:50:31PM +0200 : > >>>[djw9202@mccarthy djw9202]$ which less >>>/usr/bin/less >> >>[bgmilne@bgmilne bgmilne]$ which more >>/bin/more >>The real question is, what is too much? most? > > >

Re: [Cooker] Patch for mkinitrd

2002-12-12 Thread David Walser
--- Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Buchan Milne wrote on Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at > 08:50:31PM +0200 : > > > > > > [djw9202@mccarthy djw9202]$ which less > > > /usr/bin/less > > [bgmilne@bgmilne bgmilne]$ which more > > /bin/more > > The rea

Re: [Cooker] Patch for mkinitrd

2002-12-12 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Buchan Milne wrote on Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 08:50:31PM +0200 : > > > > [djw9202@mccarthy djw9202]$ which less > > /usr/bin/less > [bgmilne@bgmilne bgmilne]$ which more > /bin/more > The real question is, what is too much? most? Buchan, you probably alr

Re: [Cooker] Patch for mkinitrd

2002-12-12 Thread Buchan Milne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Walser wrote: > --- Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>Maybe head/tail should be in /bin also? >> >>The less we have in /, the better. > > > [djw9202@mccarthy djw9202]$ which less > /usr/bin/less > > Yeah it would be better to h

Re: [Cooker] Patch for mkinitrd

2002-12-12 Thread David Walser
--- Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe head/tail should be in /bin also? > > The less we have in /, the better. [djw9202@mccarthy djw9202]$ which less /usr/bin/less Yeah it would be better to have less in / :P __ Do you Yah

Re: [Cooker] Patch for mkinitrd

2002-12-12 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wednesday 11 December 2002 18:21, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > > > After all mkinitrd uses awk, and thats in /usr/bin > > > > why do you say that? > > OK, the /usr/bin/awk is symlinked to ../../bin/awk

Re: [Cooker] Patch for mkinitrd

2002-12-12 Thread John Allen
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 18:21, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Monday 09 December 2002 22:36, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > > John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > The following patch to mkinitrd will prevent monumental screwups when > >

Re: [Cooker] Patch for mkinitrd

2002-12-12 Thread John Allen
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 22:58, Levi Ramsey wrote: > On Tue Dec 10 8:55 +, John Allen wrote: > > After all mkinitrd uses awk, and thats in /usr/bin > > Uhhh... no. > > [root@tatiana root]# which awk > /bin/awk > [root@tatiana root]# ls -l `which awk` > lrwxrwxrwx1 root root

Re: [Cooker] Patch for mkinitrd

2002-12-11 Thread Levi Ramsey
On Tue Dec 10 8:55 +, John Allen wrote: > After all mkinitrd uses awk, and thats in /usr/bin Uhhh... no. [root@tatiana root]# which awk /bin/awk [root@tatiana root]# ls -l `which awk` lrwxrwxrwx1 root root4 Oct 15 16:24 /bin/awk -> gawk* [root@tatiana root]# which gawk /b

Re: [Cooker] Patch for mkinitrd

2002-12-11 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Monday 09 December 2002 22:36, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The following patch to mkinitrd will prevent monumental screwups when > > > your fstab accidentally contains multiple entries for / (k3b screwed m

Re: [Cooker] Patch for mkinitrd

2002-12-10 Thread John Allen
On Monday 09 December 2002 22:36, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The following patch to mkinitrd will prevent monumental screwups when > > your fstab accidentally contains multiple entries for / (k3b screwed mine > > over). > > [gc@obiwan ~] which head > /u

Re: [Cooker] Patch for mkinitrd

2002-12-09 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
John Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The following patch to mkinitrd will prevent monumental screwups when your > fstab accidentally contains multiple entries for / (k3b screwed mine over). [gc@obiwan ~] which head /usr/bin/head not good -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesof

Re: [Cooker] Patch for mkinitrd

2002-12-06 Thread Ben Reser
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:55:57PM +, John Allen wrote: > The following patch to mkinitrd will prevent monumental screwups when your > fstab accidentally contains multiple entries for / (k3b screwed mine over). > > > > ** >

[Cooker] Patch for mkinitrd

2002-12-04 Thread John Allen
The following patch to mkinitrd will prevent monumental screwups when your fstab accidentally contains multiple entries for / (k3b screwed mine over). ** The information contained in this message is confidential and is intende