Re: [Cooker] Postings

2000-07-12 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Veit Waltemath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 12:17:16PM +0100, Alex Boag-Munroe wrote: Why are postings taking a stupidly long time to appear on the list??? Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is the right way. Very funny. -- "Pixel, il faut

Re: [Cooker] Postings

2000-07-12 Thread Alexander Skwar
On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 06:13:54PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Veit Waltemath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 12:17:16PM +0100, Alex Boag-Munroe wrote: Why are postings taking a stupidly long time to appear on the list??? Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL

[Cooker] Postings

2000-07-10 Thread Alex Boag-Munroe
Why are postings taking a stupidly long time to appear on the list???

Re: [Cooker] Postings

2000-07-10 Thread Veit Waltemath
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 12:17:16PM +0100, Alex Boag-Munroe wrote: Why are postings taking a stupidly long time to appear on the list??? Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is the right way. -- Veit Waltemath [EMAIL PROTECTED] **\ Linux-Mandrake 7.1 rocks

RE: [Cooker] Postings

2000-07-10 Thread Alex Boag-Munroe
That's what I thought, I'm glad you mentioned it. And no, it doesn't make any bloody difference whether you use a c or a C!!! Read the RFC document on e-mail addresses and domain names. (Not sure which one it is). SO. Why do cooker, or Cooker postings take so damn long to appear