RE: [Cooker] RPM spec question: OR's in Requires?

2000-08-03 Thread Geoffrey Lee
> everytime :-), when you want a new feature on rpm you have to ask on > official rpm list. Not we don't want to implement the feature, but on > this area we have to do carrefull to don't have too much > mandrakizafications (i don't speak for macros, i speak with adding tag > or something like th

Re: [Cooker] RPM spec question: OR's in Requires?

2000-08-03 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 04:26:09PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > As chmou said, ask this on the redhat rpm-devel mailing list :-). > Where and when did he say that? everytime :-), when you want a new feature on rpm you have to ask on officia

Re: [Cooker] RPM spec question: OR's in Requires?

2000-08-02 Thread Alexander Skwar
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 04:26:09PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > As chmou said, ask this on the redhat rpm-devel mailing list :-). Where and when did he say that? Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys I

Re: [Cooker] RPM spec question: OR's in Requires?

2000-08-01 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > I wasn't so much talking about that specfic problem anymore, I just wanted > to know if I can require one or the other package. Lets say that I wanted > to write a spec file which would require KDE *OR* GNOME (I know, doesn't > make sense, but

Re: [Cooker] RPM spec question: OR's in Requires?

2000-08-01 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'd like to write a spec file for the Perl module ExtUtils::F77. This > > module makes only sense to use with an installed Fortran compiler. So I'd > > like to require either gcc-g77 OR egcs-g77 (or maybe both :-]), but I don't > > want to req

Re: [Cooker] RPM spec question: OR's in Requires?

2000-07-31 Thread Alexander Skwar
On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 12:40:05AM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Why not the solution of %{_bindir}/g77 it seems good no? I'm now requiring {_bindir}/f77. I wasn't so much talking about that specfic problem anymore, I just wanted to know if I can require one or the other package. Lets sa

Re: [Cooker] RPM spec question: OR's in Requires?

2000-07-31 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Guten Morgen! > > I'd like to write a spec file for the Perl module ExtUtils::F77. This > module makes only sense to use with an installed Fortran compiler. So I'd > like to require either gcc-g77 OR egcs-g77 (or maybe both :-]), but I don't > want

[Cooker] RPM spec question: OR's in Requires?

2000-07-31 Thread Alexander Skwar
Guten Morgen! I'd like to write a spec file for the Perl module ExtUtils::F77. This module makes only sense to use with an installed Fortran compiler. So I'd like to require either gcc-g77 OR egcs-g77 (or maybe both :-]), but I don't want to require BOTH. So this would be not correct: Require