On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 18:13:50 +0100
Götz Waschk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good point. Also, it's not too hard to rebuild the remaining source
> packages yourself.
That's exactly what I am doing except for the kde pkgs, which I don't
really use.
Charles
Premature optimiza
Am Freitag, 20. Dezember 2002, 11:23:51 Uhr MET, schrieb Charles A Edwards:
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 16:56:35 +0100
> Götz Waschk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But the programs that would be removed without force won't run after
> > the update, so letting urpmi remove them or force the installation h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For now just update the individual packages like kdebase, etc until the stuff
is all recompiled. Then when all your deps for glibc are recompiled and
installed on your system update glibc then.
As of now the only thing on my system that will break w
Am Freitag, 20. Dezember 2002, 17:04:14 Uhr MET, schrieb Owen Savill:
> >> The symbol libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2) has been removed from 4mdk
> Isn't this a bit brutal, considering that everything either depends in
> /lib or /usr/lib versions of this file ? Are you moving over to a
> different PT
>> The symbol libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2) has been removed from 4mdk
Isn't this a bit brutal, considering that everything either depends in
/lib or /usr/lib versions of this file ? Are you moving over to a
different PThread standard / model / POSIX compliancy or what ? I have
heard great stuff
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 16:56:35 +0100
Götz Waschk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But the programs that would be removed without force won't run after
> the update, so letting urpmi remove them or force the installation has
> a similar effect.
But if you do the force install the other pkgs, when rebuil
Am Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2002, 16:16:09 Uhr MET, schrieb francesco.melo:
> >The symbol libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2) has been removed from 4mdk, so
> >all those packages have to be rebuild.
> do we have to wait and update one after one or we have to remove all thi
> pkg, install new glibc and af
Am Freitag, 20. Dezember 2002, 16:49:16 Uhr MET, schrieb francesco.melo:
> >Unless you want to force the installation, you have to remove all
> >packages that still require the symbol above to install glibc-2.3.1-4mdk.
> excuse me
> how can i force al the pkg ?
> i tryed with urpmi --allow-nodeps
>
Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2002, 16:16:09 Uhr MET, schrieb francesco.melo:
The symbol libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2) has been removed from 4mdk, so
all those packages have to be rebuild.
do we have to wait and update one after one or we have to remove all thi
pkg, ins
Götz Waschk wrote:
Am Freitag, 20. Dezember 2002, 08:10:17 Uhr MET, schrieb Charles A Edwards:
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:45:53 +0100 (CET)
Gwenole Beauchesne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Name: glibcRelocations: (not
relocateable) Version : 2.3.1
Am Freitag, 20. Dezember 2002, 08:10:17 Uhr MET, schrieb Charles A Edwards:
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:45:53 +0100 (CET)
> Gwenole Beauchesne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Name: glibcRelocations: (not
> > relocateable) Version : 2.3.1
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:45:53 +0100 (CET)
Gwenole Beauchesne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Name: glibcRelocations: (not
> relocateable) Version : 2.3.1 Vendor:
> MandrakeSoft Release : 4mdk Build Date:
> Thu
12 matches
Mail list logo
