Kaixo!
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 09:21:45AM -0400, Camille Begnis wrote:
> > Name: rpm Distribution: Mandrake
> > Version : 3.0.4 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> > Release : 0.5mdkBuild Date: Mon Mar 06 05:56:46 200
Camille Begnis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Shouldn't be hackrpm-3.0.4-5mdk.rpm then?
no because the rpm-3.0.4 is the current version and less buggy than
rpm-3.0.3, hackWHATEVER is here only when you want to provide two set
of rpm one stable and one developement.
--
MandrakeSoft Inc
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Camille Begnis
> > Sent: Monday, March 06, 2000 9:22 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-3.0.4-0.5mdk
> >
> >
> > Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
> > >
> > > --=-=-=
PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-3.0.4-0.5mdk
>
>
> Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
> >
> > --=-=-=
> > Name: rpm Distribution: Mandrake
> > Version : 3.0.4 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> > Release
Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
>
> --=-=-=
> Name: rpm Distribution: Mandrake
> Version : 3.0.4 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 0.5mdkBuild Date: Mon Mar 06 05:56:46 2000
I just noticed, why a decimal release nu
