Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-4.0.3-8mdk

2002-03-07 Thread Frederic Lepied
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --- Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No it's correct for Mandrake users because they can rebuild the rpm of the distrib out of the box. And the point of that is...? If you're gonna take the time to compile something on your own machine,

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-4.0.3-8mdk

2002-03-07 Thread David Walser
--- Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: other compilation options haven't been tested intensily like the i586 ones. And I guess you'd like it to stay that way. Anyway it sounds like a gcc problem not a Mandrake one. __ Do You Yahoo!? Try

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-4.0.3-8mdk

2002-03-05 Thread David Walser
--- Frederic Lepied [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No it's correct for Mandrake users because they can rebuild the rpm of the distrib out of the box. And the point of that is...? If you're gonna take the time to compile something on your own machine, it should be optimizing for it. By *default*.

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-4.0.3-8mdk

2002-03-04 Thread Frederic Lepied
David Walser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No, that's still wrong. It's correct for Mandrake's build machine, but not for Mandrake users. There's no reason it shouldn't default to buildling for the arch it's running on. (More info below). No it's correct for Mandrake users because they can