On Sun 15 Jun 2003 11:11, Olivier Blin posted as excerpted below:
> > No, it doesn't. What Han is asking for is this. Say you installed foo
> > and urpmi pulled in libbar and libmoo as things foo depended on. If you
> > then urpme foo, libbar and libmoo don't get uninstalled. If, however,
> > you u
andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 16 June 2003 11:18, François Pons wrote:
> > Another problably good approach would be using compssUsers file, as no lib
> > package are listed as only effective packages (for the user) are inside it.
> >
> > François.
> What about lib$something-devel a
On Monday 16 June 2003 11:18, François Pons wrote:
> Another problably good approach would be using compssUsers file, as no lib
> package are listed as only effective packages (for the user) are inside it.
>
> François.
What about lib$something-devel and pygnome-libglade
On 16 Jun 2003, [iso-8859-15] François Pons wrote:
> Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Dependency example:
> > A Requires B
> > B Requires C
> > B Requires D
> > C Requires D
> > E Requires D
> >
> > urpme A would also suggest to remove B?
> > urpme A would also suggest to remo
Olivier Blin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No, it doesn't. What Han is asking for is this. Say you installed foo
> > and urpmi pulled in libbar and libmoo as things foo depended on. If you
> > then urpme foo, libbar and libmoo don't get uninstalled. If, however,
> > you urpme'd libbar, foo *would*
> Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Yes. Assuming that when a package starts with "lib" that it's an
>> intermidiate package may be correct. Any examples that prove the
>> contrary?
>
> Another problably good approach would be using compssUsers file, as no
> lib package are liste
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes. Assuming that when a package starts with "lib" that it's an intermidiate
> package may be correct. Any examples that prove the contrary?
Another problably good approach would be using compssUsers file, as no lib
package are listed as only eff
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yep. So you would like a switch / option to be added that when you remove foo
> (urpme foo --something) that it'll suggest to remove libbar and libmoo as wel.
> Hmmm... Interesting. What critera will be used to remove those packages? Should
> start
Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 18:50, Steve Fox wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 11:24, Han Boetes wrote:
> > > > Feature request: when you install a package you often need other
> > > > packages to be installed as we
--- Charles Shirley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 15 June 2003 19:36, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Of course we could, but do we want to? The whole
> point of this change,
> > it seems to me, is to be more elegant, and yanking
> out libraries a user
> > is relying on and expecting them to r
On Sunday 15 June 2003 19:36, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Of course we could, but do we want to? The whole point of this change,
> it seems to me, is to be more elegant, and yanking out libraries a user
> is relying on and expecting them to reinstall them manually does not
> strike me as being that.
On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 22:31, Charles Shirley wrote:
> On Sunday 15 June 2003 14:42, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 19:11, Olivier Blin wrote:
> > > > No, it doesn't. What Han is asking for is this. Say you installed foo
> > > > and urpmi pulled in libbar and libmoo as things foo d
On Sunday 15 June 2003 14:42, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 19:11, Olivier Blin wrote:
> > > No, it doesn't. What Han is asking for is this. Say you installed foo
> > > and urpmi pulled in libbar and libmoo as things foo depended on. If you
> > > then urpme foo, libbar and libmoo d
On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 19:11, Olivier Blin wrote:
> > No, it doesn't. What Han is asking for is this. Say you installed foo
> > and urpmi pulled in libbar and libmoo as things foo depended on. If you
> > then urpme foo, libbar and libmoo don't get uninstalled. If, however,
> > you urpme'd libbar, fo
> No, it doesn't. What Han is asking for is this. Say you installed foo
> and urpmi pulled in libbar and libmoo as things foo depended on. If you
> then urpme foo, libbar and libmoo don't get uninstalled. If, however,
> you urpme'd libbar, foo *would* be uninstalled. That is, urpme
> uninstalls thi
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 23:53:54 +0200
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Don't you sleep ?
I mean :-) ... gosh you are so up to date
--
Thibaut Fernagut, Director of Security
Burning Frog - I.T. Services To Set Your World On Fire
Doornstraat 32, B-8970, Poperinge, Belgium
Te
Another flaw with the log file idea is that some users install packages
with the rpm tool. Unless you patched the Mandrake version of rpm, these
wouldn't get appended to the log file.
In my opinion, urpme, when asked to remove a package, should look through
each of it's dependencies, check they'r
On Saturday 14 June 2003 09:07 am, David Sansome wrote:
> On Saturday 14 Jun 2003 12:21 pm, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> > >>>You suggesting to calculate it. These calculations can become very
> > >>>complex. I would suggest to make a log. So if you urpmi foo, you also
> > >>>have to install bar an
Another flaw with the log file idea is that some users install packages with
the rpm tool. Unless you patched the Mandrake version of rpm, these wouldn't
get appended to the log file.
Indeed. I propose not to persue the logfile track.
In my opinion, urpme, when asked to remove a package, shou
On Saturday 14 Jun 2003 12:21 pm, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> >>>You suggesting to calculate it. These calculations can become very
> >>>complex. I would suggest to make a log. So if you urpmi foo, you also
> >>>have to install bar and blah. This results in a line in
> >>>/var/cache/urpmi/installl
You suggesting to calculate it. These calculations can become very
complex. I would suggest to make a log. So if you urpmi foo, you also
have to install bar and blah. This results in a line in
/var/cache/urpmi/installlog: foo bar blah
Q: What would the impact be if you install multiple pack
>>You suggesting to calculate it. These calculations can become very
>> complex. I would suggest to make a log. So if you urpmi foo, you also
>> have to install bar and blah. This results in a line in
>>/var/cache/urpmi/installlog: foo bar blah
>>
> Q: What would the impact be if you install multi
If, however, you urpme'd libbar, foo *would* be uninstalled. That
is, urpme uninstalls things that depend on the package you call to
be urpme'd, but not things the package you call to be urpme'd
depends upon. Clear?
Yep. So you would like a switch / option to be added that when you
remove f
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If, however, you urpme'd libbar, foo *would* be uninstalled. That
> > is, urpme uninstalls things that depend on the package you call to
> > be urpme'd, but not things the package you call to be urpme'd
> > depends upon. Clear?
>
> Yep. So you wo
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 23:12, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> >>>Feature request: when you install a package you often need other
> >>>packages to be installed as well. Could you make a list of those
> >>>dependant extra installed packages? So if peope uninstall the first
> >>>package you can also dein
Feature request: when you install a package you often need other
packages to be installed as well. Could you make a list of those
dependant extra installed packages? So if peope uninstall the first
package you can also deinstall the packages it depended on. Of course
only if no other packages depe
Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 18:50, Steve Fox wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 11:24, Han Boetes wrote:
> > > Feature request: when you install a package you often need other
> > > packages to be installed as well. Could you make a list of those
> > > dependant
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 18:50, Steve Fox wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 11:24, Han Boetes wrote:
> > Feature request: when you install a package you often need other
> > packages to be installed as well. Could you make a list of those
> > dependant extra installed packages? So if peope uninstall the
Steve Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 11:24, Han Boetes wrote:
> > Feature request: when you install a package you often need other
> > packages to be installed as well. Could you make a list of those
> > dependant extra installed packages? So if peope uninstall the first
>
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 11:24, Han Boetes wrote:
> Feature request: when you install a package you often need other
> packages to be installed as well. Could you make a list of those
> dependant extra installed packages? So if peope uninstall the first
> package you can also deinstall the packages it
François Pons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Name: urpmi
Feature request: when you install a package you often need other
packages to be installed as well. Could you make a list of those
dependant extra installed packages? So if peope uninstall the first
package you can also deinstall the pa
31 matches
Mail list logo
