Le ven 14/11/2003 à 15:39, Juan Quintela a écrit :
svetoslav == Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
svetoslav :(
svetoslav so far no one (officialy) stated anything about 2.6 and mdk-10.0, am i
svetoslav wrong ?
Humm, I told in previous message what I thought. But as always, it
robert == Robert Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi
robert Just wondering, what is the rough development plan for Cooker?
robert Specifically, at what stage will the kernel 2.6 series be the focus and
robert the 2.4 go to contribs?
No. Just finishing a 2.6 kernel code (based on the one in
svetoslav == Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi
svetoslav :(
svetoslav so far no one (officialy) stated anything about 2.6 and mdk-10.0, am i
svetoslav wrong ?
Humm, I told in previous message what I thought. But as always, it is
my opinion :) Not sure what is Mandrake
Hi,
robert == Robert Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
robert Just wondering, what is the rough development plan for Cooker?
robert Specifically, at what stage will the kernel 2.6 series be the
focus and
robert the 2.4 go to contribs?
No. Just finishing a 2.6 kernel code (based on the one
My opinion would be we can have 2.6 kernel for workstation installs and
2.4 for server installs. I have been running 2.6 on my laptop and every
thing is working so far, save for the PCMCIA. I have not done any
investigation into that yet. I would like to have an RC or beta type
kernel by or around
svetoslav == Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi
svetoslav :(
svetoslav so far no one (officialy) stated anything about 2.6 and
mdk-10.0, am i
svetoslav wrong ?
Humm, I told in previous message what I thought. But as always, it is
my opinion :) Not sure what is
