Re: [Cooker] Re: LVM2 devmapper updated

2003-09-24 Thread Svetoslav Slavtchev
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:41:49AM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote: PS. any words from the MDK team ? Thomas would you include it ? is cooker unfrozen? :-) (mail 2) can this go in, or we have to ask latter ? svetljo PS. the dm patches for 2.4.22.1mdk do work OK on my UP system i'm

Re: [Cooker] Re: LVM2 devmapper updated

2003-09-07 Thread Luca Berra
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:41:49AM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote: PS. any words from the MDK team ? Thomas would you include it ? i refreshed lvm versions at http://percy.comedia.it/~bluca/cooker/lvm2 i also added a modified initrd there, which adds lvm2 support, changes md behaviour (will load

Re: [Cooker] Re: LVM2 devmapper updated

2003-09-07 Thread Svetoslav Slavtchev
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:41:49AM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote: PS. any words from the MDK team ? Thomas would you include it ? i refreshed lvm versions at http://percy.comedia.it/~bluca/cooker/lvm2 i also added a modified initrd there, which adds lvm2 support, changes md

[Cooker] Re: LVM2 devmapper updated

2003-08-28 Thread Luca Berra
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 11:13:21PM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote: i updated your src.rpms to LVM1-1.0.7 LVM2-1.00.06 dm-1.00.04 (hopefully i didn't add some bugs) Thank you, actually i had in mind of changing the layout again, putting binaries in /sbin/lvm1 and /sbin/lvm2, since lvm2 tools

Re: [Cooker] Re: LVM2 devmapper updated

2003-08-28 Thread Svetoslav Slavtchev
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 11:13:21PM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote: i updated your src.rpms to LVM1-1.0.7 LVM2-1.00.06 dm-1.00.04 (hopefully i didn't add some bugs) Thank you, actually i had in mind of changing the layout again, putting binaries in /sbin/lvm1 and /sbin/lvm2, since lvm2

Re: [Cooker] Re: LVM2 devmapper updated

2003-08-28 Thread Luca Berra
Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote: Thank you, actually i had in mind of changing the layout again, putting binaries in /sbin/lvm1 and /sbin/lvm2, since lvm2 tools check for name and cannot be invoked when called lvm2-toolname. why would you need to call them with lvm1-toolname or lvm2-toolname, you made

Re: [Cooker] Re: LVM2 devmapper updated

2003-08-28 Thread Svetoslav Slavtchev
i'm still not sure about the fls(), did you have in mind smth like the attachment ZY19... yes, but i won't swear it is correct, what about asking Joe Thornber, or someone else from sistina? i just sent an e-mail to dm-devel, lvm-devel Joe Thornber let's wait a bit :) saw the