On Saturday 06 September 2003 23:05, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > at first, i strongly disagree with dadou violation of the
> > > packaging policy.
> > >
> > > but now i think that dadou thoughs is that we'll quite always
> > > install rxvt since it's requ
David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > at first, i strongly disagree with dadou violation of the
> > packaging policy.
> >
> > but now i think that dadou thoughs is that we'll quite always
> > install rxvt since it's required by drakconf, even if user has not
> > asked for terminals.
>
> M
Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> at first, i strongly disagree with dadou violation of the packaging policy.
>
> but now i think that dadou thoughs is that we'll quite always install
> rxvt since it's required by drakconf, even if user has not asked for
> terminals.
Meanwhile the users that actually *wan
