Re: [Cooker] Re: Re: Re: rpmdrake and proxy (and bwlimit!)

2003-08-14 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For dialup users, it absolutely is important enough. I certainly > wouldn't dream of asking for every possible option to be in the > GUI. I add it to my todo but I think it will be low-priority. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/

[Cooker] Re: Re: Re: rpmdrake and proxy (and bwlimit!)

2003-08-04 Thread David Walser
Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, David Walser wrote: >> >> > Olivier Blin wrote: >> > > >> > > damned, it's already here, but there's a typo, line 430 : >> > > elsif (($k, $v) = >> > > /^(limit-rate|excludepath|key_ids|split-(?:level