On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 01:24:31PM +0800, Leon Brooks wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:11, Ben Reser wrote:
> > 3. Rename wipe in lam-runtime to lamwipe.
>
> If that follows the trend for postfix, cups etc it would be wipe.lam
> instead. I would use lamwipe (or the name of the lam crew's choice)
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:11, Ben Reser wrote:
> 3. Rename wipe in lam-runtime to lamwipe.
If that follows the trend for postfix, cups etc it would be wipe.lam
instead. I would use lamwipe (or the name of the lam crew's choice) and
make wipe.lam a link to it, then link alternatives to wipe.lam.
>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 10:10:51PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> The situation that I really want to avoid is a LAM user using "wipe
> hostfile", and instead of shutting down their LAM universe, the file
> named "hostfile" is totally erased from the filesystem. That would be
> *most* unexepected be
