Re: [Cooker] Re: a few urpmi questions

2001-06-26 Thread François Pons
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There's no XFree86-devel there, while urpmi --auto gnome-libs-devel does install > it... (I'm sorry if I'm a bit impatient, this feature will solve many issues I'm > having with my damn scripts)... Well, I have forget it, it is my fault but -m mo

Re: [Cooker] Re: a few urpmi questions

2001-06-26 Thread François Pons
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There's no XFree86-devel there, while urpmi --auto gnome-libs-devel does install > it... (I'm sorry if I'm a bit impatient, this feature will solve many issues I'm > having with my damn scripts)... Ok, I work on it now. François.

Re: [Cooker] Re: a few urpmi questions

2001-06-25 Thread Stefan van der Eijk
> > >>I've got a few urpmi related questions: >> >>1/ Do urpmi --auto and urpmq -d use different ways to solve their dependancies? >> > >They should not, this could be side effect. > Is it fixed with urpmi-1.6-3mdk? [root@taz root]# urpmq -d gnome-libs-devel | sort db1|compat-glibc esound freetyp

[Cooker] Re: a few urpmi questions

2001-06-25 Thread François Pons
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've got a few urpmi related questions: > > 1/ Do urpmi --auto and urpmq -d use different ways to solve their dependancies? They should not, this could be side effect. > XFree86-devel is missing on this list. Is it because urpmq only shows the