On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 01:15:57PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
> Hmm, before I check with the mutt'ies, how did you check that the SASL
> version only uses plaintext, while the non-SASL uses CRAM-MD5, like you
> reported? I'd like to check this myself, to get first hand knowledge.
Well you
So sprach Geoffrey Lee am Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 05:55:38PM +1000:
> Me / David Odin / Alexander reached a concensus to build it with SASL to see
> what would happen. We didn't think that it would break this kind of
> autnentication ...
Exactly.
> Alexander, do you want me to remove the SASL supp
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 03:15:13AM -0700, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 10:57:50AM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, in -3mdk, we built it with SASL support.
>
> A. The strace does show the loading of libsasl and an opening
> of /usr/lib/sasl. Nothing more
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 10:57:50AM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
> Hmm, in -3mdk, we built it with SASL support.
A. The strace does show the loading of libsasl and an opening
of /usr/lib/sasl. Nothing more seems to do with sasl.
> Please try the non-SASL
> version from
>
> ht
