Re: [Cooker] Two persistent kfm bugs

2000-01-23 Thread David Faure
On Sat, Jan 22, 2000 at 06:06:20PM -0600, Guy T. Rice wrote: > David Faure wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 09:08:50PM +, Civileme wrote: > > > The situation is as follows > > > > > > Any system with linux-mandrake 6.0, 6.1 or 7.0 (Beta 5) And I > > > don't know about AIR, with a mount

Re: [Cooker] Two persistent kfm bugs

2000-01-22 Thread Guy T. Rice
David Faure wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 09:08:50PM +, Civileme wrote: > > The situation is as follows > > > > Any system with linux-mandrake 6.0, 6.1 or 7.0 (Beta 5) And I > > don't know about AIR, with a mounted vfat partition accessible > > to the logged user in rw mode. AND it DOE

Re: [Cooker] Two persistent kfm bugs

2000-01-22 Thread Civileme
David Faure wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 09:08:50PM +, Civileme wrote: > > The situation is as follows > > > > Any system with linux-mandrake 6.0, 6.1 or 7.0 (Beta 5) And I > > don't know about AIR, with a mounted vfat partition accessible > > to the logged user in rw mode. AND it DOESN

Re: [Cooker] Two persistent kfm bugs

2000-01-22 Thread David Faure
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 09:08:50PM +, Civileme wrote: > The situation is as follows > > Any system with linux-mandrake 6.0, 6.1 or 7.0 (Beta 5) And I > don't know about AIR, with a mounted vfat partition accessible > to the logged user in rw mode. AND it DOESN'T MATTER if you > specify dots

Re: [Cooker] Two persistent kfm bugs

2000-01-22 Thread Quel Qun
CTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Cooker] Two persistent kfm bugs >Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 04:38:19 + > >Quel Qun wrote: > > > >From: Civileme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >

Re: [Cooker] Two persistent kfm bugs

2000-01-21 Thread Civileme
Quel Qun wrote: > >From: Civileme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: [Cooker] Two persistent kfm bugs > >Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 00:49:18 + > > > > > >Uhhh > > >

Re: [Cooker] Two persistent kfm bugs

2000-01-21 Thread Quel Qun
>From: Civileme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Cooker] Two persistent kfm bugs >Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 00:49:18 + > > >Uhhh > >There was no question of using any other WM. I needed one I >cou

Re: [Cooker] Two persistent kfm bugs

2000-01-21 Thread Civileme
WH Bouterse wrote: > A rather dumb question, (again) but... > why insist on using kde? > > Is it user desire to use the most M$-like > window manager or? > > With all the VERY FINE Linux WindowMangers > installed on Linux_Mandrake, > I was just curious? > > William Bouterse Uhhh There was

Re: [Cooker] Two persistent kfm bugs

2000-01-21 Thread WH Bouterse
A rather dumb question, (again) but... why insist on using kde? Is it user desire to use the most M$-like window manager or? With all the VERY FINE Linux WindowMangers installed on Linux_Mandrake, I was just curious? William Bouterse