Re: [Cooker] Why do we have pspell?

2003-03-26 Thread Oden Eriksson
måndagen den 24 mars 2003 11.24 skrev Oden Eriksson: måndagen den 24 mars 2003 10.57 skrev Marcel Pol: On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 08:14:53 +0100 Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why do we still have the pspell package(s) in the distro? It conflicts with aspell, and I've heard from

Re: [Cooker] Why do we have pspell?

2003-03-24 Thread Marcel Pol
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 08:14:53 +0100 Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why do we still have the pspell package(s) in the distro? It conflicts with aspell, and I've heard from others that aspell provides a pspell library. Also, nothing in the distro appears to require the pspell

Re: [Cooker] Why do we have pspell?

2003-03-24 Thread Oden Eriksson
måndagen den 24 mars 2003 10.57 skrev Marcel Pol: On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 08:14:53 +0100 Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why do we still have the pspell package(s) in the distro? It conflicts with aspell, and I've heard from others that aspell provides a pspell library. Also,

[Cooker] Why do we have pspell?

2003-03-23 Thread David Walser
Why do we still have the pspell package(s) in the distro? It conflicts with aspell, and I've heard from others that aspell provides a pspell library. Also, nothing in the distro appears to require the pspell packages.

Re: [Cooker] Why do we have pspell?

2003-03-23 Thread Oden Eriksson
måndagen den 24 mars 2003 01.43 skrev David Walser: Why do we still have the pspell package(s) in the distro? It conflicts with aspell, and I've heard from others that aspell provides a pspell library. Also, nothing in the distro appears to require the pspell packages. php-spell --