Re: [Cooker] Why does rpmdrake default to deleting everything on an error?

2002-12-23 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Richard Ketchersid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't understand why this is the default. Your machine downloads > updates for an hour, then one little problem and all is lost. It really > wastes a lot of time and makes rpmdrake more of a pain than a help. I > always have to use "urpmi --node

Re: [Cooker] Why does rpmdrake default to deleting everything on an error?

2002-12-20 Thread David Walser
--- "J. Greenlees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Richard Ketchersid wrote: > > I don't understand why this is the default. Your > machine downloads > > updates for an hour, then one little problem and > all is lost. It really > > wastes a lot of time and makes rpmdrake more of a > pain than a help

[Cooker] Why does rpmdrake default to deleting everything on an error?

2002-12-20 Thread Richard Ketchersid
I don't understand why this is the default. Your machine downloads updates for an hour, then one little problem and all is lost. It really wastes a lot of time and makes rpmdrake more of a pain than a help. I always have to use "urpmi --nodelete --auto-select ..." instead. I can't find informat