Re: [Cooker] X running on tty 9

2001-04-04 Thread Guillaume Rousse
On 2001.04.03 02:56:41 -0400 R.I.P. Deaddog wrote: > > tty 7 is occupied.. then how about tty8? X tries to start at the > FIRST > unoccupied tty did /etc/syslog.conf give u any hint? Thanks for the explanation. I found Bastille added an entry in /etc/syslog.conf adding logging to tty

Re: [Cooker] X running on tty 9

2001-04-02 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
tty 7 is occupied.. then how about tty8? X tries to start at the FIRST unoccupied tty did /etc/syslog.conf give u any hint? Abel Cheung On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > > On 2001.03.28 11:40:33 -0500 Guillaume Rousse wrote: > > I just discovered X running on tty 9 ra

Re: [Cooker] X running on tty 9

2001-04-02 Thread Bruce F. Press
Guillaume Rousse wrote: > > On 2001.03.28 11:40:33 -0500 Guillaume Rousse wrote: > > I just discovered X running on tty 9 rather than standard tty 7. Why ? > I also discovered it's specific to my laptop installation, as it runs > nomally on tty7 on another desktop. > Moreover, i have /var/log/mes

Re: [Cooker] X running on tty 9

2001-04-02 Thread Guillaume Rousse
On 2001.03.28 11:40:33 -0500 Guillaume Rousse wrote: > I just discovered X running on tty 9 rather than standard tty 7. Why ? I also discovered it's specific to my laptop installation, as it runs nomally on tty7 on another desktop. Moreover, i have /var/log/messages output on tty7 on the laptop.

[Cooker] X running on tty 9

2001-03-28 Thread Guillaume Rousse
I just discovered X running on tty 9 rather than standard tty 7. Why ? -- Guillaume Rousse Murphy's law : If anything can go wrong, it will. O'Tool's commentary : Murphy was an optimist.