Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> you're right, but we can't accept removing the i810 support which is used quite
> a lot. The only solution would be to include a framebuffer driver for non-vesa
> video card like the i810. Alas it must be included in the kernel and we really
there is no frame
"Mattias Dahlberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi François,
>
> > > What version of XFree86 does DrakX use?
> >
> > 3.3.6.
>
> Why not 4.0.2? Is it too big?
the main pb is that we don't want to include all the drivers for the different
graphic which would be huge. So we only use the framebuf
"Mattias Dahlberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi François,
>
> > > What version of XFree86 does DrakX use?
> >
> > 3.3.6.
>
> Why not 4.0.2? Is it too big?
Yes larger, Problably much larger. We have to take a look.
>
> > > Has there been thoughts of running DrakX on framebuffer version of
Hi François,
> > What version of XFree86 does DrakX use?
>
> 3.3.6.
Why not 4.0.2? Is it too big?
> > Has there been thoughts of running DrakX on framebuffer version of
> > either QT or Gtk?
>
> No more i810 so...
No, but perhaps other advantages? Such as speed? Doesn't it take some
valuable r
"Mattias Dahlberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
Hi,
>
> I just did a Cooker install and noticed that DrakX still falls back to 16
> color VGA for the i810 chipset, although it has been supported in XFree86 for
> a while.
Yes, we have only two server for DrakX, FBDev and VGA16 for card th
Hi!
I just did a Cooker install and noticed that DrakX still falls back to 16
color VGA for the i810 chipset, although it has been supported in XFree86 for
a while.
What version of XFree86 does DrakX use?
Has there been thoughts of running DrakX on framebuffer version of either QT
or Gtk?
Matt
