Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-10 Thread guran
On Monday 10 December 2001 3:19 pm, Fabrice FACORAT wrote: I really envy you your knowledges, but I am an old guy and I don't think that I have the stamina to aquire that broad and deep knowledge. So my letter was more of the style, put a new log in the fire, and see if it takes on. What I see

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-10 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
le lun 10-12-2001 à 00:40, guran a écrit : > But there seem to be such a product, on LWN I read about an Elx distribution. > My concerns was about the difficulty to make choices, when you feel unsecure, > that is to say I don't think the new user wants to master Unix he/she wants > to achieve

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-10 Thread Mathias BAVAY
David wrote: > Yes! Yes! Yes! Terminals must stay! I agree ! Of course, terminals are very powerfull, pleaseant tu use, But we must remember our feeling the first time we were in front of a terminal So the new user must be able to configure everything using a GUI, and after some time,

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-09 Thread Ryan Little
On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 18:01, Fabrice FACORAT wrote: > > why the hell do you want to use emacs ?joe, pico ... You forgot JED :> the best editor out there. -- Ryan -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GCC$/CS d+(d-) s: a? C> UL+++> P>+++ L+++ E+ W+ N+++ o! ?K w O- M(M+) V

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-09 Thread David
Fabrice FACORAT wrote: > le dim 09-12-2001 à 17:57, David a écrit : > >>I replied to your response to the terminals and think they should always >>stay. But yes, I think the product should evolve more toward making it >>easier for newbies, >> > > ??? > I don't see your point. > No : I NEVER

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-09 Thread guran
On Monday 10 December 2001 12:00 am, Fabrice FACORAT wrote: > it's not the term fault. That is exactly my point, the person coming from XP and seeing this behaviour, doesn't give a shit about what causes the mishap, if the desired behaviour is not there - it is a fault. Let us stop here. Bye.

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-09 Thread guran
On Monday 10 December 2001 12:01 am, Fabrice FACORAT wrote: > why the hell do you want to use emacs ?joe, pico ... I was merely using it as an example of one way to master the Unix way, personally I use mc or the command line for many of the tasks, I have once leraned to do from there. My ini

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-09 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
le dim 09-12-2001 à 02:41, guran a écrit : > Hi > > I had one of my sons visiting some weeks, and he used XP, during his stay. I > must say that Mdk looks like a 'LEGO-kit' compared to it when multimedia is > conserned. I know that the pieces is coming about, but I think that some has > to thi

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-09 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
le dim 09-12-2001 à 18:27, guran a écrit : > All here do love the freedom given by Linux, but there might be programs that > has an old design built in. Emacs is a program that tries to do everything as > if from one desktop - understand me right, if you have mastered it you fly - > but a newb

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-09 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
le dim 09-12-2001 à 20:00, guran a écrit : > On Sunday 09 December 2001 7:06 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > So sprach »guran« am 2001-12-09 um 18:27:58 +0100 : > > > I think that is self-evident, but not all terminals are handling fonts in > > > a nice way. When you increase the size of the font,

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-09 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
le dim 09-12-2001 à 17:57, David a écrit : > > I replied to your response to the terminals and think they should always > stay. But yes, I think the product should evolve more toward making it > easier for newbies, ??? I don't see your point. No : I NEVER use Vi. I'd rather use joe and it's q

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-09 Thread guran
On Sunday 09 December 2001 7:06 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote: > So sprach »guran« am 2001-12-09 um 18:27:58 +0100 : > > I think that is self-evident, but not all terminals are handling fonts in > > a nice way. When you increase the size of the font, and the window > > expands out from your screen, th

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-09 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach »guran« am 2001-12-09 um 18:27:58 +0100 : > I think that is self-evident, but not all terminals are handling fonts in a > nice way. When you increase the size of the font, and the window expands out > from your screen, then you can not say that this is done wisely. Hm? What do you me

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-09 Thread guran
On Sunday 09 December 2001 5:50 pm, David wrote: > Yes! Yes! Yes! Terminals must stay! ... I think that is self-evident, but not all terminals are handling fonts in a nice way. When you increase the size of the font, and the window expands out from your screen, then you can not say that this i

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-09 Thread David
guran wrote: > I must have made a mess of my points: > > My son uses Solaris in his job, he made me try it, until I showed him that > Mdk was faster on a single processor sparcstation. I have used Linux since > RedHat 3.0.3 Picasso so my daughter sometimes shows me how things are done > today

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-09 Thread David
>>And take those old terminals and through them out a window, they are truly >>pathetic with their stupid fonts. >> > > No you are pathetic ! > ok ? > If you still belive that terminal is like DOS so you are pathetic. > Terminal will never leave and may never leave. If you don't know the > org

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-09 Thread guran
On Sunday 09 December 2001 4:46 pm, Tim McKenzie wrote: > The ultimate goal is having things included so that the user doesn't have > to go get them whenever possible. Working out a deal with the companies > that provide the software for free shouldn't be overly hard and it would > greatly help t

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-09 Thread Tim McKenzie
> I know that the pieces is coming about, but I think that some has > to think out a solution to deliver a polished and ready package for those > that don't give a damned shit about GPL and related stuff. > > Call it Mandrake Vega or whatever, make it cost but add flash, realplayer &c, > i.e make

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-09 Thread guran
I must have made a mess of my points: My son uses Solaris in his job, he made me try it, until I showed him that Mdk was faster on a single processor sparcstation. I have used Linux since RedHat 3.0.3 Picasso so my daughter sometimes shows me how things are done today with a right mouse click

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-09 Thread Maxim Heijndijk
* Stardate: 2001-12-09 10:06 * Incoming subspace signal from "Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" : > > And take those old terminals and through them out a window, they are truly > > pathetic with their stupid fonts. > No you are pathetic ! > ok ? > If you still belive that terminal is like DOS

Re: [Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-09 Thread Fabrice FACORAT
le dim 09-12-2001 à 02:41, guran a écrit : > I had one of my sons visiting some weeks, and he used XP, during his stay. I > must say that Mdk looks like a 'LEGO-kit' compared to it when multimedia is > conserned. true. It's Linux in general. Until some good API will be widely use and more op

[Cooker] XP <-> Mdk in multimedia

2001-12-08 Thread guran
Hi I had one of my sons visiting some weeks, and he used XP, during his stay. I must say that Mdk looks like a 'LEGO-kit' compared to it when multimedia is conserned. I know that the pieces is coming about, but I think that some has to think out a solution to deliver a polished and ready packa