Why use PNG format when JPG will make files considerably smaller, thus
getting more files on the first cd?
Jorg
On 3 Sep 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Why use PNG format when JPG will make files considerably smaller, thus
getting more files on the first cd?
http://www.webtechniques.com/archives/2001/06/savetz/
So?
quote
However, PNG won't replace JPEG. For photographic images that can
tolerate
Jorg Pitts (306170) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why use PNG format when JPG will make files considerably smaller, thus
getting more files on the first cd?
http://www.webtechniques.com/archives/2001/06/savetz/
Jorg Pitts (306170) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why use PNG format when JPG will make files considerably smaller, thus
getting more files on the first cd?
1. it's not meant to be photos (final won't have)
2. drakx doesn't have libjpeg handling to keep as small as possible
Pixel wrote:
Jorg Pitts (306170) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why use PNG format when JPG will make files considerably smaller, thus
getting more files on the first cd?
1. it's not meant to be photos (final won't have)
2. drakx doesn't have libjpeg handling to keep as small as possible