Re: [Cooker] bin86

2000-06-29 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
"Geoffrey Lee" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is bin86-0.14.5-1.i386.rpm in RH contrib newer than 0.4 in Cooker? Also I noticed the description is not in English. yep it is. just checked on appwatch. bin86 is obsolete, now we use dev86- -- MandrakeSoft Inc

RE: [Cooker] bin86

2000-06-28 Thread Don Head
Technologies, Inc. [1 800 826-4640 x1942] [AIM - Don Wave][ICQ - 18804935][Yahoo - Don_Wave] -Original Message- From: Geoffrey Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 2:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Cooker] bin86 Is bin86-0.14.5-1.i386.rpm in RH

[Cooker] bin86

2000-06-27 Thread David Walluck
Is bin86-0.14.5-1.i386.rpm in RH contrib newer than 0.4 in Cooker? Also I noticed the description is not in English. Description : Balk bin86 poskytuje assembler a linker pre 80x86 in trukcie relneho re imu. Tento balk potrebujete ma nain talovany, pokia chcete preklada programy fungujce v

RE: [Cooker] bin86

2000-06-27 Thread Geoffrey Lee
Is bin86-0.14.5-1.i386.rpm in RH contrib newer than 0.4 in Cooker? Also I noticed the description is not in English. yep it is. just checked on appwatch. Description : Balk bin86 poskytuje assembler a linker pre 80x86 in trukcie relneho re imu. Tento balk potrebujete ma nain