On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 00:32, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 13:20, Adam Williamson wrote:
No - they don't build unless the symlink exists, so you can assume I
create it myself every time this happens. Now here's something REAL odd
- I reinstalled 0.5.1tmb and now THAT'S got
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 13:52, Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 13:20:50 +0100
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No - they don't build unless the symlink exists, so you can assume I
create it myself every time this happens. Now here's something REAL
odd- I reinstalled
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 13:20, Adam Williamson wrote:
No - they don't build unless the symlink exists, so you can assume I
create it myself every time this happens. Now here's something REAL odd
- I reinstalled 0.5.1tmb and now THAT'S got the bug too! ARGH. I'll keep
playing. I'm going to try
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003 00:09:32 +0100
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah, interesting. Next time you update source, could you verify that
before the ivh the link from /lib/modules/yourversionhere/build to
/usr/src/linux (or, uh, whichever way around I should write it :)
does not exist,
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 01:28, Adam Williamson wrote:
See topic. I just tried out the latest Cooker kernel,
2.4.22-2mdkenterprise, and it's STILL missing the
/lib/modules/2.4.22-2mdkenterprise/build - /usr/src/linux-2.4.22-2mdk
symlink and STILL exhibits the bug I reported a couple of weeks back
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 13:08, Thomas Backlund wrote:
From: Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 01:28, Adam Williamson wrote:
See topic. I just tried out the latest Cooker kernel,
2.4.22-2mdkenterprise, and it's STILL missing the
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 13:20:50 +0100
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No - they don't build unless the symlink exists, so you can assume I
create it myself every time this happens. Now here's something REAL
odd- I reinstalled 0.5.1tmb and now THAT'S got the bug too! ARGH. I'll
keep
