Re: [Cooker] drakx/diskdrake and NTFS

2001-09-30 Thread Mike & Tracy Holt
andre wrote: >On zo, 2001-09-30 at 22:59, Mike & Tracy Holt wrote: > >>civileme wrote: >> >>>Does no one realize that there are THREE variations of the NTFS and that one >>>of them is readable (and experimentally writeable) by linux, and more work on >>>read/write for the newer two is likely to

Re: [Cooker] drakx/diskdrake and NTFS

2001-09-30 Thread andre
On zo, 2001-09-30 at 22:59, Mike & Tracy Holt wrote: > civileme wrote: > > > > >Does no one realize that there are THREE variations of the NTFS and that one > >of them is readable (and experimentally writeable) by linux, and more work on > >read/write for the newer two is likely to be stalled b

Re: [Cooker] drakx/diskdrake and NTFS

2001-09-30 Thread Mike & Tracy Holt
civileme wrote: > >Does no one realize that there are THREE variations of the NTFS and that one >of them is readable (and experimentally writeable) by linux, and more work on >read/write for the newer two is likely to be stalled by threats or the >potential for threats of legal action? > >Micr

Re: [Cooker] drakx/diskdrake and NTFS

2001-09-30 Thread civileme
On Sunday 30 September 2001 14:37, Frederik Himpe wrote: > Hello, > > One thing that I noticed in the Mandrake 8.1 installer, is that it does > not mount NTFS partitions by default. I think this should be done by > default, as is done for FAT32 partitions. > > When you explicitely mount the NTFS p

[Cooker] drakx/diskdrake and NTFS

2001-09-30 Thread Frederik Himpe
Hello, One thing that I noticed in the Mandrake 8.1 installer, is that it does not mount NTFS partitions by default. I think this should be done by default, as is done for FAT32 partitions. When you explicitely mount the NTFS partitions yourself in the Mandrake installer, the partitions are only