Why is dynamic desktop required by devfs? Shouldn't it be the other way
around, that dynamic requires devfs?
--
/g
Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read -Groucho Marx
Le Mardi 28 Octobre 2003 14:40, Greg Meyer a écrit :
Why is dynamic desktop required by devfs? Shouldn't it be the other way
around, that dynamic requires devfs?
I allready asked, but never got an answer, worst, dynamic is still buggy on
9.2 with usb key. Saturday, just before to start a
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 11:43 am, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
Le Mardi 28 Octobre 2003 14:40, Greg Meyer a écrit :
Why is dynamic desktop required by devfs? Shouldn't it be the other way
around, that dynamic requires devfs?
I allready asked, but never got an answer, worst, dynamic is still