torsdagen den 13 februari 2003 10.49 skrev Buchan Milne: > Oden Eriksson wrote: > > onsdagen den 12 februari 2003 20.11 skrev Buchan Milne: > > > > > > I cheated and took a look at what PLD has done about it. It seems you > > need a speech_tools-devel package before building festival. > > > > ftp://ftp.rpmfind.net/linux/PLD/current/dists/ra/PLD/SRPMS/SRPMS/speech_t > >ools-1.2.2-2.src.rpm > > ftp://ftp.rpmfind.net/linux/PLD/current/dists/ra/PLD/SRPMS/SRPMS/festival > >-1.4.2-4.src.rpm > > Hmmm, just when I went and made the festival srpm have seperate binary > packages, and had it ready to upload!
Hey, as long as it works. > I had a speech_tools package, but the festival headers were so stuffed, > even if I had speech_tools-devel installed it would not come close to > compiling (expecting local headers). > > OK, I have now working voices (festvox, to use the name of the tarballs) > and dictionary (festlex, same reason) packages. All festvox packages > provide festival-voice (and some more such as festival-voice-english, > festival-voice-en_UK etc), and festival requires festival-voice. The > voice packages require the dictionary packages they need. urpmi prompts > to choose the festvox package, only thing is it seems festival does not > start up without the kal diphone, so I might have to require that. Just > need to split off the non-free voices into a seperate srpm and we are > ready ... Cool! To be honest it sounds like greek to me as I don't know how to use any of this stuff... Do we have any blind listeners and experts here who could shed some light on this festival stuff? > But I will take a look at the pld stuff now ... There where some interesting patches in there. -- Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT.com
