Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.2

2002-08-19 Thread Oden Eriksson
On måndagen den 19 augusti 2002 03.35 Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Oden Eriksson wrote: > > On lördagen den 17 augusti 2002 12.08 Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > There's no need to rebuild everything now with the final gcc i hope? > > > > > > Nope, the tarball

Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.2

2002-08-19 Thread Gwenole Beauchesne
On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, Oden Eriksson wrote: > On lördagen den 17 augusti 2002 12.08 Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > There's no need to rebuild everything now with the final gcc i hope? > > > > Nope, the tarball contains the same bits as the one used for 3.2-0.3mdk. > > I just wanted an

Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.2

2002-08-17 Thread Yura Gusev
Gwenole Beauchesne said: > Hi, > >> There's no need to rebuild everything now with the final gcc i hope? > > Nope, the tarball contains the same bits as the one used for > 3.2-0.3mdk. I just wanted an -1mdk before jumping onto CVS snapshot > 3.2-20020815. ;-) Noo. Please next time!

Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.2

2002-08-17 Thread Gwenole Beauchesne
Hi, > There's no need to rebuild everything now with the final gcc i hope? Nope, the tarball contains the same bits as the one used for 3.2-0.3mdk. I just wanted an -1mdk before jumping onto CVS snapshot 3.2-20020815. ;-)

Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.2

2002-08-17 Thread Jason Straight
Nope - everything's fine after update. On Saturday 17 August 2002 02:41 pm, Oden Eriksson wrote: > Hi. > > (Gwenole?) > > There's no need to rebuild everything now with the final gcc i hope? -- Jason Straight

Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.2

2002-08-17 Thread Jason Straight
Heh - that's what I was just wondering. On Saturday 17 August 2002 02:41 pm, Oden Eriksson wrote: > Hi. > > (Gwenole?) > > There's no need to rebuild everything now with the final gcc i hope? -- Jason Straight

[Cooker] gcc-3.2

2002-08-17 Thread Oden Eriksson
Hi. (Gwenole?) There's no need to rebuild everything now with the final gcc i hope? -- Regards // Oden Eriksson Deserve-IT Networks -> http://d-srv.com

Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.2?

2002-08-16 Thread David Walser
--- Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > far. If ML9.0 would be > released and compiled with this gcc-3.2-1mdk it > would be the first time in > history (AFAIK) Mandrake used an official gcc > release, that would be very > nice. Thanks. Not that it wouldn't be patched like crazy, but as

Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.2?

2002-08-16 Thread Buchan Milne
Oden Eriksson wrote: > And I assumed this was a CVS snapshot because gcc-3.2 final was released > 2002/08/14. I never checked if the sources were the same. Maybe a diff would > tell the thruth in this case, but I didn't go that far. If ML9.0 would be > released and compiled with this gcc-3.2-1

Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.2?

2002-08-16 Thread Oden Eriksson
On fredagen den 16 augusti 2002 02.59 Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > Hi, > > > Today I got an announcement via freshmeat that gcc-3.2 was released.., > > well > > actually it was released yesterday (2002/08/14). In Cooker we have a CVS > > snapshot(?) from 2002/08/12, wouldn't it be great to have an

Re: [Cooker] gcc-3.2?

2002-08-15 Thread Gwenole Beauchesne
Hi, > Today I got an announcement via freshmeat that gcc-3.2 was released.., > well > actually it was released yesterday (2002/08/14). In Cooker we have a CVS > snapshot(?) from 2002/08/12, wouldn't it be great to have an official > gcc for > a change in a Mandrake release? Hmm, what do you me

[Cooker] gcc-3.2?

2002-08-15 Thread Oden Eriksson
Hola! Today I got an announcement via freshmeat that gcc-3.2 was released.., well actually it was released yesterday (2002/08/14). In Cooker we have a CVS snapshot(?) from 2002/08/12, wouldn't it be great to have an official gcc for a change in a Mandrake release? -- Regards // Oden Eriksson