hehe, oops :)
Yes, I meant 2.2.4 and 2.2.5. I went back to 2.2.4 from 8.2 final because I
didn't have 2.2.5-1 any more :(
On Friday 12 April 2002 09:57, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 09:51:03AM -0400, Jason Straight wrote:
> > /lib/libc.so.6
> >
> > Subject pretty much says it
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Jason Straight wrote:
> Subject pretty much says it all. Went back to 2.4.4 and vmware is happy
> again.
There is no glibc-2.4.5-2mdk. ;-) Indeed, there is a problem with
2.2.5-2mdk and I am looking at it now. You can revert to 2.2.5-1mdk. Also
note that atexit symbol is t
On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 09:51:03AM -0400, Jason Straight wrote:
> /lib/libc.so.6
>
> Subject pretty much says it all. Went back to 2.4.4 and vmware is happy again.
>
but there's no 2.4.x branch of glibc ;)
Or do you mean glibc 2.2.4 ...
- G.
/lib/libc.so.6
Subject pretty much says it all. Went back to 2.4.4 and vmware is happy again.
--
^^^
Jason Straight
President
BlazeConnect Internet Services
Cheboygan Michigan
www.blazeconnect.net
Phone: 231-597-0376
