Ian White wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Seth Cohn wrote:
>
> > Any plans for a 386 (or better) version of Mandrake?
>
> That and having some sort of very minimal install are the two features I'd
> really like. Would be handy for doing firewalls on low-end boxes.
>
> Ian White
I ran a 'this is Li
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Seth Cohn wrote:
> > >rpm -ba --target i386 *
>
> Any plans for a 386 (or better) version of Mandrake?
> I can't count the number of times I say "Oh, Mandrake is the
> way to go.." only to find that they have a 486 or something,
> and have to backtrack and tell them to go wi
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Seth Cohn wrote:
> > >rpm -ba --target i386 *
>
> Any plans for a 386 (or better) version of Mandrake?
For 6.1: Yes, that's what I'm (obviously ;) ) currently building.
For Cooker: No. If you want it, build it yourself.
LLaP
bero
--
Tired of waiting for Windows 2000?
I'm allowed to convert our 486 Pool PC's (We use them for courses) to
Linux. I would also very much like to be able to put Mandrake on them.
Jo
Seth Cohn wrote:
>
> > >rpm -ba --target i386 *
>
> Any plans for a 386 (or better) version of Mandrake?
> I can't count the number of times I say "Oh
> >rpm -ba --target i386 *
Any plans for a 386 (or better) version of Mandrake?
I can't count the number of times I say "Oh, Mandrake is the
way to go.." only to find that they have a 486 or something,
and have to backtrack and tell them to go with Redhat.
Seth
