Re: [Cooker] kde2 and kdenlightenment

1999-10-05 Thread webmedic
Thanks that worked. One other thing; is there a way to make it start automatically? Right now I have to log on in failsafe and type .xinitrc in the terminal. On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, you wrote: > On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, you wrote: > > Actualy what I have is just kfm and enlightenment going. I > > could

Re: [Cooker] kde2 and kdenlightenment

1999-09-30 Thread Michael Irving
On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, you wrote: > Actualy what I have is just kfm and enlightenment going. I > couldn't get it to work any other way. So the panel isn't even > running but the desktop icons are. > > That is easy to fix.. just go into a shell and type eesh once in that type kde on and then save c

Re: [Cooker] kde2 and kdenlightenment

1999-09-30 Thread webmedic
Actualy what I have is just kfm and enlightenment going. I couldn't get it to work any other way. So the panel isn't even running but the desktop icons are. On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, you wrote: > On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, you wrote: > > Tried both of these. They are very interesting. I think I will > > us

Re: [Cooker] kde2 and kdenlightenment

1999-09-30 Thread Michael Irving
On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, you wrote: > Tried both of these. They are very interesting. I think I will > use kfm and enlightenment for a while it runs faster than kwm > and seems to be just as stable. Plus I get all the enlightenment > goodies. > The kde interface in E is pretty good now.. But it is

[Cooker] kde2 and kdenlightenment

1999-09-30 Thread webmedic
Tried both of these. They are very interesting. I think I will use kfm and enlightenment for a while it runs faster than kwm and seems to be just as stable. Plus I get all the enlightenment goodies. About kde2; it seems that it would be more stable than this. It must run at least a little bit se