On 20 Dec 2002 22:38:19 -0500
Fluri Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 11:10, Buchan Milne wrote:
I was wondering if it would be possible for the kernel team to have a
look at CIFS for 2.4.x? CIFS will probably be replacing smbfs in 2.6,
and has been merged into 2.5.x
On Sat, 21 Dec 2002, Marcel Pol wrote:
On 20 Dec 2002 22:38:19 -0500
Fluri Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 11:10, Buchan Milne wrote:
I was wondering if it would be possible for the kernel team to have a
look at CIFS for 2.4.x? CIFS will probably be replacing smbfs
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 11:10, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering if it would be possible for the kernel team to have a
look at CIFS for 2.4.x? CIFS will probably be replacing smbfs in 2.6,
and has been merged into 2.5.x already.
CIFS has the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering if it would be possible for the kernel team to have a
look at CIFS for 2.4.x? CIFS will probably be replacing smbfs in 2.6,
and has been merged into 2.5.x already.
CIFS has the following advantages over smbfs:
1)2GB file support
