Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-04-02 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So sprach Chmouel Boudjnah am Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 10:33:39PM +0200: > > README removed, in kernel-doc... > > Now that *exactly* was a solution R.I.P. and me didn't come up with :)) A > good one, though. simple solution is beautiful ;) -- Mandrak

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-04-02 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Chmouel Boudjnah am Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 10:33:39PM +0200: > README removed, in kernel-doc... Now that *exactly* was a solution R.I.P. and me didn't come up with :)) A good one, though. Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Hom

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-04-02 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So sprach Chmouel Boudjnah am Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 08:46:27PM +0200: > > should be fixed in last 2.4.3-* kernel. > > How? README removed, in kernel-doc... -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmou

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-04-02 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Chmouel Boudjnah am Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 08:46:27PM +0200: > should be fixed in last 2.4.3-* kernel. How? Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com | http://www.iso-top.de iso-to

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-04-02 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
"R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmmm maybe you're true. But seems the ONLY conflict comes from this > README file. > > Several fixes possible: > 1) remove the README from packaging altogether > 2) rename README to README-2.4.2-something in packaging > 3) rpm -ivh --force ^_^

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-04-01 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
But we are just doing headless and useless discussion anyway :) Can't change anything.. :( Abel Cheung On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Alexander Skwar wrote: > So sprach R.I.P. Deaddog am Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 06:34:29PM +0800: > > > > Yes, but do you know the workload needed if you try to change > >

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-04-01 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach R.I.P. Deaddog am Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 06:34:29PM +0800: > > Yes, but do you know the workload needed if you try to change > %%docdir. Hmm, oh, yes, you are right. Didn't think about this. I think your first approach would be the best way: Don't install it as /usr/share/doc/kern

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-04-01 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
Yes, but do you know the workload needed if you try to change %%docdir. Abel Cheung On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Alexander Skwar wrote: > So sprach R.I.P. Deaddog am Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 06:56:33PM +0800: > > > > Nope, it's this /usr/share/doc/kernel-2.4.2/README that's causing > > conflict! Plea

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-03-31 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach R.I.P. Deaddog am Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 06:56:33PM +0800: > > Nope, it's this /usr/share/doc/kernel-2.4.2/README that's causing > conflict! Please refer to previous posts if you are not sure. Yes, I know - and that's why I said that it should not be put in /usr/share/doc/kernel-2.4.2, b

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-03-31 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
Nope, it's this /usr/share/doc/kernel-2.4.2/README that's causing conflict! Please refer to previous posts if you are not sure. Abel Cheung On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Alexander Skwar wrote: > So sprach R.I.P. Deaddog am Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 07:24:54AM +0800: > > > > OK. just a matter of taste.

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-03-30 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach R.I.P. Deaddog am Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 07:24:54AM +0800: > > OK. just a matter of taste. But I'd prefer removing all duplicate > files rather than keeping multiple copies of the same file if not > necessary. Okay, I see your point. But then /usr/share/doc/kernel-2.4.2/README shoul

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-03-30 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
OK. just a matter of taste. But I'd prefer removing all duplicate files rather than keeping multiple copies of the same file if not necessary. Abel Cheung On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, Alexander Skwar wrote: > So sprach R.I.P. Deaddog am Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 01:45:39AM +0800: > > > > Then it shou

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-03-30 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach R.I.P. Deaddog am Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 01:45:39AM +0800: > > Then it should be removed completely, as in (1): > > $ ls -l /usr/share/doc/kernel-2.4.2/README /usr/src/linux/README > [...] 14151 Jan 28 02:51 /usr/share/doc/kernel-2.4.2/README > [...] 14151 Jan 28 02:51 /usr/src/linux/R

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-03-30 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
Then it should be removed completely, as in (1): $ ls -l /usr/share/doc/kernel-2.4.2/README /usr/src/linux/README [...] 14151 Jan 28 02:51 /usr/share/doc/kernel-2.4.2/README [...] 14151 Jan 28 02:51 /usr/src/linux/README Abel Cheung On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Alexander Skwar wrote: > So sprach R

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-03-30 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach R.I.P. Deaddog am Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 03:52:20AM +0800: > > Hmmm maybe you're true. But seems the ONLY conflict comes from this > README file. > > Several fixes possible: > 1) remove the README from packaging altogether > 2) rename README to README-2.4.2-something in packaging > 3

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-03-30 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach R.I.P. Deaddog am Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 01:34:16AM +0800: > . > rpm -Uvh , not rpm -ivh Wrong - rpm -ivh kernel RPM's. Never -Uvh 'em before you know that they work. Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-03-29 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 01:34:16AM +0800, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote: > . > rpm -Uvh , not rpm -ivh And if the new kernel is broken, like say the one a few revs back that barfed on aic7xxx controllers? What do we do then seeing as we wiped out the last known good kernel with the rpm -U? b. --

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-03-29 Thread OS
Hmmm ! You're brave ! Surely rpm -ivh, test new kernel, if (ok) rpm -e old ? Owen On Thursday 29 March 2001 5:34 pm, you wrote: > . > rpm -Uvh , not rpm -ivh > > At 10:21 AM 2001/3/29 -0700, you wrote: > ># rpm -ivh kernel-2.4.2-21mdk.i586.rpm > >file /usr/share/doc/kernel-2.4.2/README from

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-03-29 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
Hmmm maybe you're true. But seems the ONLY conflict comes from this README file. Several fixes possible: 1) remove the README from packaging altogether 2) rename README to README-2.4.2-something in packaging 3) rpm -ivh --force ^_^ Abel Cheung On 29 Mar 2001, Quel Qun wrote: > Hey man!

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-03-29 Thread Quel Qun
Hey man! Cooker has been nice until now because you always could install several kernel packages at the same time without conflict. Don't stop it now. "R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > . > rpm -Uvh , not rpm -ivh > > > At 10:21 AM 2001/3/29 -0700, you wrote: > ># rpm -ivh kernel

Re: [Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-03-29 Thread R.I.P. Deaddog
. rpm -Uvh , not rpm -ivh At 10:21 AM 2001/3/29 -0700, you wrote: ># rpm -ivh kernel-2.4.2-21mdk.i586.rpm >file /usr/share/doc/kernel-2.4.2/README from install of kernel-2.4.2-21mdk >conflicts with file from package kernel-2.4.2-20mdk > > >=-= >kk1 > >

[Cooker] kernel-2.4.2-21 conflict w/ previous

2001-03-29 Thread Quel Qun
# rpm -ivh kernel-2.4.2-21mdk.i586.rpm file /usr/share/doc/kernel-2.4.2/README from install of kernel-2.4.2-21mdk conflicts with file from package kernel-2.4.2-20mdk =-= kk1 Get free email and a permanent address at http://www