[Cooker] kernel question

2003-05-31 Thread David Walser
Has anybody put in a request to have the code at http://atmelwlandriver.sourceforge.net/downloads.html put in our kernel? A friend of mine says it contains a fastvnet_cs module needed for his 3com 3CRSHPW696 wireless NIC card. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar -

[Cooker] kernel question...

2002-01-07 Thread Franki
Hi all, Sorry to ask such a basic question, but I was wondering if anyone here could help me. I want to upgrade the kernel to 2.4.17.x and get the headers and initscripts and iptables to match. Is it safe to upgrade the glibc to the cooker version along with the kernel and stuff.. I have an

Re: [Cooker] kernel question

2000-11-01 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Each kernel image in /boot has its own entry in /etc/lilo.conf so you can choose at boot time which one to use. But there is also one system map for each kernel, produced at compilation, and lilo.conf only allows one to be specified... So, what

Re: [Cooker] kernel question

2000-10-31 Thread Frederic Crozat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guillaume Rousse) writes: Ok, this not specialy a mandrake question, but i did RTFM first, and didn't find any answer in Kernel- and LILO-HOWTO, neither in the 'running linux' bible :-) Each kernel image in /boot has its own entry in /etc/lilo.conf so you can choose at

[Cooker] kernel question

2000-10-30 Thread Guillaume Rousse
Ok, this not specialy a mandrake question, but i did RTFM first, and didn't find any answer in Kernel- and LILO-HOWTO, neither in the 'running linux' bible :-) Each kernel image in /boot has its own entry in /etc/lilo.conf so you can choose at boot time which one to use. But there is also one

Re: [Cooker] kernel question

2000-09-13 Thread Tim McKenzie
So I really need agpgart module, but it gives a resource busy error when trying to load it. I already managed to use NVidia driver with an older Mandrake. --- I'm not sure this is relevant, but perhaps you could ask the guys at Red Hat... The beta 6.9.5 works wonderfully with all

[Cooker] kernel question

2000-09-12 Thread pgeorges
Is current cooker stable kernel kernel-2.2.17-1mdk.i586.rpm expected to support AGP ? (I have a GeForce 256 with i820 chipset, and trying to use NVidia drivers, but can't load agpgarp module)

Re: [Cooker] kernel question

2000-09-12 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
pgeorges [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is current cooker stable kernel kernel-2.2.17-1mdk.i586.rpm expected to support AGP ? (I have a GeForce 256 with i820 chipset, and trying to use NVidia drivers, but can't load agpgarp module) Please test 2mdk and let me know. -- MandrakeSoft Inc

Re: [Cooker] kernel question

2000-09-12 Thread Guillaume Rousse
pgeorges a écrit : Is current cooker stable kernel kernel-2.2.17-1mdk.i586.rpm expected to support AGP ? (I have a GeForce 256 with i820 chipset, and trying to use NVidia drivers, but can't load agpgarp module) I successfully used NVidia drivers with precedent Kernel (2.2.16-9mdk) build

Re: [Cooker] kernel question

2000-09-12 Thread Bryan Whitehead
AFAIK NVIDIA has there own APG stuff in their kernel module. It's one of the resonse they can't give out the source - they licensed thier APG tech from someone else. On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, pgeorges wrote: Is current cooker stable kernel kernel-2.2.17-1mdk.i586.rpm expected to support AGP ?

Re: [Cooker] kernel question

2000-09-12 Thread pgeorges
Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit : pgeorges [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is current cooker stable kernel kernel-2.2.17-1mdk.i586.rpm expected to support AGP ? (I have a GeForce 256 with i820 chipset, and trying to use NVidia drivers, but can't load agpgarp module) Please test 2mdk and let

Re: [Cooker] kernel question

2000-09-12 Thread Bryan Whitehead
The NVIDIA FAQ says this: "Currently internally supported chipsets include: Intel 440LX, 440BX, 440GX, 815, 820, and 840. AMD Irongate, VIA Apollo Pro133, KX133 and KT133. More chipsets may be supported through the use of AGPGART." So internally the driver provided by NVIDIA does not need the

[Cooker] Kernel Question

2000-02-14 Thread Don Krause
I noticed that there seems to be support for the HPT366 UDMA/66 chip that's on Abit's MB in one of the kernels on the 7.0, but I didn't see the patch in the kernel sources. (makes it a little tough to rebuild your kernel if your only drive lives on the controller..) Is the patch on the 7.0 image

Re: [Cooker] Kernel Question

2000-02-14 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
"Don Krause" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I noticed that there seems to be support for the HPT366 UDMA/66 chip that's on Abit's MB in one of the kernels on the 7.0, but I didn't see the patch in the kernel sources. (makes it a little tough to rebuild your kernel if your only drive lives on the