Re: [Cooker] libatk dependencies fail:

2001-10-18 Thread Peter Ruskin
On Friday 19 Oct 2001 00:19, Han wrote: > cjw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > #!/bin/sh > > # get listing > > mv -f .listing .listing.1 > > mv -f index.html index.html.1 > > wget -nr > > ftp://ftp.surfnet.nl/pub/os/Linux/distr/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooke > >r/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/ # transform listi

Re: [Cooker] libatk dependencies fail:

2001-10-18 Thread Han
cjw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > #!/bin/sh > # get listing > mv -f .listing .listing.1 > mv -f index.html index.html.1 > wget -nr >ftp://ftp.surfnet.nl/pub/os/Linux/distr/Mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/ > # transform listing into usable format to file "listing" > mv -f listing

Re: [Cooker] libatk dependencies fail:

2001-10-18 Thread cjw
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Han wrote: > Stefan van der Eijk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Han wrote: > >>Stefan van der Eijk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > >>>ls /mirrors/cooker/${HOSTTYPE}/Mandrake/RPMS \ > > >>I am sure your script will fail on this line. What is the sollution? > > > It's the locati

Re: [Cooker] libatk dependencies fail:

2001-10-18 Thread Han
Stefan van der Eijk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Han wrote: >>Stefan van der Eijk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >>>ls /mirrors/cooker/${HOSTTYPE}/Mandrake/RPMS \ >>I am sure your script will fail on this line. What is the sollution? > It's the location on my disk where I've got cooker mirrored. It

Re: [Cooker] libatk dependencies fail:

2001-10-18 Thread Stefan van der Eijk
Han wrote: >Stefan van der Eijk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >>ls /mirrors/cooker/${HOSTTYPE}/Mandrake/RPMS \ >> > >I am sure your script will fail on this line. What is the sollution? > It's the location on my disk where I've got cooker mirrored. It does work here, what would be wrong with it?

Re: [Cooker] libatk dependencies fail:

2001-10-18 Thread Han
Stefan van der Eijk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > ls /mirrors/cooker/${HOSTTYPE}/Mandrake/RPMS \ I am sure your script will fail on this line. What is the sollution? Cya, Han.

Re: [Cooker] libatk

2001-06-05 Thread Geoffrey Lee
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 11:06:37PM -0600, Peter Polman wrote: > Has it been mentioned that the posted libatk package is buitl for i686 and > not for the i586 as the extension suggests? Don't have a Pentium machine with me, can't confirm, so I'll just go and rebuild it. -- Geoffrey Lee <[EMA

[Cooker] libatk

2001-06-04 Thread Peter Polman
Has it been mentioned that the posted libatk package is buitl for i686 and not for the i586 as the extension suggests?