Re: [Cooker] mdk 7.1 problems

2000-06-30 Thread Christopher Molnar
Can you send me directly, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (not the list) your install.log and your auto_inst.cfg.pl file out of the /root directory? This will help troubleshoot. -Chris On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Pascal Grosse wrote: Hello dear list, I installed Mandrake 7.1 (final), and I must say i'm very

Re: [Cooker] mdk 7.1 problems

2000-06-30 Thread Con Kolivas
The answer is in what you are upgrading. As reiserfs was an expert only option I guess it was assumed that you would tread carefully when upgrading the kernel. If you check the updates page on the Mandrake web site you would read: Important: If you use ReiserFS, please don't forget to: do a

Re: [Cooker] mdk 7.1 problems

2000-06-30 Thread Pascal Grosse
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 11:50:00AM +0200, Pixel wrote: Pascal Grosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello dear list, I installed Mandrake 7.1 (final), and I must say i'm very impressed by the overall quality of this new flavor of Mandrake Linux. But i nonetheless faced some problems :

Re: [Cooker] mdk 7.1 problems

2000-06-30 Thread Denis Pelletier
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Pascal Grosse wrote: { - Another package dependency problem : when using MandrakeUpdate, { i could not take the upgrade for xemacs, because of a conflict { with emacs-el. As the conflict was not here during the installation, { why introduce it later ? { { or you

Re: [Cooker] mdk 7.1 problems

2000-06-29 Thread Pixel
Pascal Grosse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello dear list, I installed Mandrake 7.1 (final), and I must say i'm very impressed by the overall quality of this new flavor of Mandrake Linux. But i nonetheless faced some problems : - I choose expert mode, so maybe i sould not complain about

[Cooker] mdk 7.1 problems

2000-06-28 Thread Pascal Grosse
Hello dear list, I installed Mandrake 7.1 (final), and I must say i'm very impressed by the overall quality of this new flavor of Mandrake Linux. But i nonetheless faced some problems : - I choose expert mode, so maybe i sould not complain about what follows :-) When choosing individual