On Sun Sep 28, 2003 at 05:19:46PM +0200, Götz Waschk wrote:
Attached is the diff against the 0.91 version.
This is all that is required to fix the problem?
The only other diff between 0.91 and 0.92 is the changed version
number. I'm afraid there could be more buffer overflow errors in
Am Samstag, 27. September 2003, 15:25:35 Uhr MET, schrieb Vincent Danen:
Attached is the diff against the 0.91 version.
This is all that is required to fix the problem?
The only other diff between 0.91 and 0.92 is the changed version
number. I'm afraid there could be more buffer overflow
Hi
I just read this on the mplayer site, there's a security hole in almost all
recent versions of mplayer. A fix-release 0.92 has been made to fix this...
http://www.mplayerhq.hu/homepage/design6/news.html
Cheers
Simon
Am Samstag, 27. September 2003, 09:35:39 Uhr MET, schrieb Simon Oosthoek:
I just read this on the mplayer site, there's a security hole in almost all
recent versions of mplayer. A fix-release 0.92 has been made to fix this...
http://www.mplayerhq.hu/homepage/design6/news.html
Arrgh, this is
Am Samstag, 27. September 2003, 09:35:39 Uhr MET, schrieb Simon Oosthoek:
I just read this on the mplayer site, there's a security hole in almost all
recent versions of mplayer. A fix-release 0.92 has been made to fix this...
http://www.mplayerhq.hu/homepage/design6/news.html
Attached is the
On Sat Sep 27, 2003 at 07:07:55PM +0200, Götz Waschk wrote:
I just read this on the mplayer site, there's a security hole in almost all
recent versions of mplayer. A fix-release 0.92 has been made to fix this...
http://www.mplayerhq.hu/homepage/design6/news.html
Attached is the diff
On Sat Sep 27, 2003 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Götz Waschk wrote:
I just read this on the mplayer site, there's a security hole in almost all
recent versions of mplayer. A fix-release 0.92 has been made to fix this...
http://www.mplayerhq.hu/homepage/design6/news.html
Arrgh, this is too late
