Dans l'article ,
"R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Just my blind guess, but is netscape 6.01 even more unstable/buggy than
> mozilla 0.8?
I think N6.01 is a little older than Moz0.8 (I don't remember on which
branch they have bas
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alexander Skwar
>
> So sprach R.I.P. Deaddog am Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 08:07:33PM +0800:
> >
> > Just my blind guess, but is netscape 6.01 even more unstable/buggy than
> > mozilla 0.8?
>
> No clue - I haven't used Netscape 6.01, since I use Mozilla 0.8.
So sprach R.I.P. Deaddog am Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 08:07:33PM +0800:
>
> Just my blind guess, but is netscape 6.01 even more unstable/buggy than
> mozilla 0.8?
No clue - I haven't used Netscape 6.01, since I use Mozilla 0.8.
Alexander Skwar
--
How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http:
Just my blind guess, but is netscape 6.01 even more unstable/buggy than
mozilla 0.8?
Abel Cheung
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> So sprach Prana am Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 06:19:21PM -0700:
> > Hmm, NVidia binary (uni-processor, multi-processor) are binary only, and
> > Netscape is a
ad
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 12:20 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [Cooker] nVidia drivers vs Netscape binary only
>
>
> > > Please tell me that netscape 6 won't become the
> > > default web browser...
> >
> > Again,
So sprach Steve Wray am Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 12:23:11PM +1300:
> And mozilla is very close to bloatware already...
> and its not even finished yet!
I think it was on /. the other day, saying that Mozilla might be at 1.0 at
the end of Q2, and that from now on they are focussing on improving sp
So sprach Don Head am Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 05:19:39PM -0600:
> I must say, for one, that Konqueror is an EXCELLENT
> browser. With the KDE2.1beta RPMS that are/were in the
To be honest, I think so to. There are still some issues left, but having a
look at how fast things are evolving, they'll s
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alexander Skwar
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 11:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] nVidia drivers vs Netscape binary only
>
> So sprach Steve Wray am Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 10:09:59AM +1300:
> > Please tell
> > Please tell me that netscape 6 won't become the
> > default web browser...
>
> Again, this is all from my vague memory, but I seem to
> remember having heard that Mozilla will, as it is the
> only free, non-Konqueror browser :]
>
> But anyway, what do you mean by "default browser"?
> Defaul
So sprach Steve Wray am Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 10:09:59AM +1300:
> Please tell me that netscape 6 won't become the default
> web browser...
Again, this is all from my vague memory, but I seem to remember having heard
that Mozilla will, as it is the only free, non-Konqueror browser :]
But anyway, w
7 AM
> To: Cooker
> Subject: Re: [Cooker] nVidia drivers vs Netscape binary only
>
>
> So sprach Prana am Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 06:19:21PM -0700:
> > Hmm, NVidia binary (uni-processor, multi-processor) are binary only, and
> > Netscape is a binary only software too. Why can
On Friday 02 March 2001 17:07, you wrote:
> So sprach Prana am Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 06:19:21PM -0700:
> > Hmm, NVidia binary (uni-processor, multi-processor) are binary only, and
> > Netscape is a binary only software too. Why can't nVidia be packaged in
> > Mandrake 8.0 while Netscape is allowed?
So sprach Prana am Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 06:19:21PM -0700:
> Hmm, NVidia binary (uni-processor, multi-processor) are binary only, and
> Netscape is a binary only software too. Why can't nVidia be packaged in
> Mandrake 8.0 while Netscape is allowed?
It's my understanding that Netscape 4.76 is goin
Hmm, NVidia binary (uni-processor, multi-processor) are binary only, and
Netscape is a binary only software too. Why can't nVidia be packaged in
Mandrake 8.0 while Netscape is allowed?
--
Prana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.cyest.org
My GnuPG Key ID: 0x33343FD3 (2000-07-21)
Key fingerprint = F1
14 matches
Mail list logo