Re: [Cooker] new glibc in unsupported directory

2001-02-20 Thread David Hedbor
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 2001.02.14 13:03:36 +0400 David Hedbor wrote: > > Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > David Hedbor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > Thank you. I have one question though - why strip (any) libraries? > > The > > > > ni

Re: [Cooker] new glibc in unsupported directory

2001-02-20 Thread David Hedbor
Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Hedbor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hmm, that's glibc 2.1.3. The problem I'm having is with cooker and > > glibc-2.2.1. I recompiled the libs myself (well, I used the RPM and > > grabbed the libs before the build was complete and build tr

Re: [Cooker] new glibc in unsupported directory

2001-02-14 Thread Guillaume Rousse
On 2001.02.14 13:03:36 +0400 David Hedbor wrote: > Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > David Hedbor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Thank you. I have one question though - why strip (any) libraries? > The > > > nice thing with Linux is that your libraries have debug symbols

Re: [Cooker] new glibc in unsupported directory

2001-02-14 Thread David Hedbor
Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Hedbor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Thank you. I have one question though - why strip (any) libraries? The > > nice thing with Linux is that your libraries have debug symbols. If > > you debug a program, this usually helps a lot when the

Re: [Cooker] new glibc in unsupported directory

2001-02-14 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
David Hedbor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmm, that's glibc 2.1.3. The problem I'm having is with cooker and > glibc-2.2.1. I recompiled the libs myself (well, I used the RPM and > grabbed the libs before the build was complete and build tree removed). which libs ? normally it should since ther

Re: [Cooker] new glibc in unsupported directory

2001-02-14 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
David Hedbor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thank you. I have one question though - why strip (any) libraries? The > nice thing with Linux is that your libraries have debug symbols. If > you debug a program, this usually helps a lot when the bug is > triggered somewhere in system or third party li

Re: [Cooker] new glibc in unsupported directory

2001-02-13 Thread David Hedbor
Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Just FYI i let you know that there is a new glibc rpm in unsupported > directory with no STRIPPING librarry which make works gdb. > > one of the unsupported mirors can be found here : > > ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/distributions/mandrak

Re: [Cooker] new glibc in unsupported directory

2001-02-13 Thread David Hedbor
Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Just FYI i let you know that there is a new glibc rpm in unsupported > directory with no STRIPPING librarry which make works gdb. > > one of the unsupported mirors can be found here : > > ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/distributions/mandrak

[Cooker] new glibc in unsupported directory

2001-02-13 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Hi, Just FYI i let you know that there is a new glibc rpm in unsupported directory with no STRIPPING librarry which make works gdb. one of the unsupported mirors can be found here : ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/distributions/mandrake-devel/unsupported> -- MandrakeSoft Inc