Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, will all the perl stuff be "stable" (consistant) tomorrow maybe?
notwithstanding contrib, it's quite ok now:
% urpmf site_perl | cut -d: -f 1 | uniq
Bastille
Bastille-Curses-module
Bastille-Tk-module
foomatic
gimp-perl
Bastille should be dropped,
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 13.40, Pixel wrote:
> Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> > perl-base >= 1:5.8.0 is needed by
> >^^
> >
> > Is this correct?
> >
> > I cannot find any perl-1:5.8.0*.rpm package, or is it a new rpm woodoo
> > magic trick?
>
> yep
Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> perl-base >= 1:5.8.0 is needed by
>^^
>
> Is this correct?
>
> I cannot find any perl-1:5.8.0*.rpm package, or is it a new rpm woodoo magic
> trick?
yep, it is the Serial (also names Epoch). perl 5.601 has serial 0,
pe
On Wednesday 10 July 2002 11.14, Pixel wrote:
> Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Since the current perl upgrades are something of a major change, I (and
> > I think probably other people) are a bit nervous to try and update my
> > Cooker now. Would it be possible for Pixel to send a
Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since the current perl upgrades are something of a major change, I (and
> I think probably other people) are a bit nervous to try and update my
> Cooker now. Would it be possible for Pixel to send an 'all clear'
> message to the list when he thinks ev
Since the current perl upgrades are something of a major change, I (and
I think probably other people) are a bit nervous to try and update my
Cooker now. Would it be possible for Pixel to send an 'all clear'
message to the list when he thinks everything that needs to be updated
has been updated an
