Ah - that would explain it. Thanks.
On Friday 15 February 2002 11:33, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 10:52:55 -0500
>
> Jason Straight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hrm, I'm using a self compiled unpatched linus kernel here with the r128
> > and fb compiled into the kernel.
>
>
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 10:52:55 -0500
Jason Straight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hrm, I'm using a self compiled unpatched linus kernel here with the r128 and
> fb compiled into the kernel.
That's the problem then.
The -17 mandrake kernel, according to Chmouel, has been synced with pre9 and cont
Hrm, I'm using a self compiled unpatched linus kernel here with the r128 and
fb compiled into the kernel.
On Friday 15 February 2002 10:39, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:47:32 -0500
>
> Jason Straight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While 8.1 worked with accelerated X from i
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:47:32 -0500
Jason Straight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While 8.1 worked with accelerated X from install something seems to be
> missing at this point from cooker as it didn't get accelerated X going.
It is a module problem with r128 in the kernel.
Upgrade to kernel-2
While 8.1 worked with accelerated X from install something seems to be
missing at this point from cooker as it didn't get accelerated X going.
Attached is my XF86Config-4.
Here are the rpm's I have installed for X
XFree86-4.2.0-3mdk
XFree86-devel-4.2.0-3mdk
XFree86-doc-4.2.0-3mdk
XFree86-libs-4
