Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Is it normal to have supermount on non-removable medias (windows
> partitions), and not on removable zip ?
In the case of the Windows partitions, perhaps supermount simply wishes that
they would be removed? (-:
Francis Galiegue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> > Is it normal to have supermount on non-removable medias (windows
> > partitions), and not on removable zip ?
> >
>
> Uhno, this is a bug! supermount should never be employed for non removable
> devices...
>
> Install bug?
supermount scri
just running supermount enable gives me this result :
/mnt/cdrom /mnt/cdrom supermount
fs=iso9660,dev=/dev/cdrom,ro,nosuid,noauto,nodev,exec 0 0
/mnt/floppy /mnt/floppy supermount
fs=vfat,dev=/dev/floppy,nosuid,noauto,nodev,unhide 0 0
/mnt/win_c /mnt/win_c supermount
f
