Re: [Cooker] weird urpmi behavior

2002-08-12 Thread François Pons
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:34:47PM -0700, Ben Reser wrote: > > Uhh this doesn't make sense... > > [root@occipital breser]# urpmi lm_sensors > > One of the following packages is needed: > > 1- lm_sensors-2.6.2-4mdk.i586 > > 2- liblm_sensors1-2.6.2-4mdk.i58

Re: [Cooker] weird urpmi behavior

2002-08-09 Thread Ben Reser
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:34:47PM -0700, Ben Reser wrote: > Uhh this doesn't make sense... > [root@occipital breser]# urpmi lm_sensors > One of the following packages is needed: > 1- lm_sensors-2.6.2-4mdk.i586 > 2- liblm_sensors1-2.6.2-4mdk.i586 > What is your choice? (1-2) 1 > To satisfy depen

Re: [Cooker] weird urpmi behavior

2002-07-09 Thread Ben Reser
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 10:31:27AM +0200, Fran?ois Pons wrote: > Do you have any bug report (--bug) available ? Sent off list. -- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ben.reser.org We tend to see all wars through the lens of the current conflict, and we mine history for lessons convenient to t

Re: [Cooker] weird urpmi behavior

2002-07-09 Thread François Pons
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Uhh this doesn't make sense... > [root@occipital breser]# urpmi lm_sensors > One of the following packages is needed: > 1- lm_sensors-2.6.2-4mdk.i586 > 2- liblm_sensors1-2.6.2-4mdk.i586 > What is your choice? (1-2) 1 > To satisfy dependencies, the followi