On Sunday 09 September 2001 1:03 pm, you wrote:
> On 7 Sep 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > > > - possibility to mount ext2 (so, possibility to use an older kernel,
> > > > or to repair a system, etc)
> > >
>
> Can you explain? If I compile ext2 support as a module, can't I mount an
> ext2fs
On 7 Sep 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > >
> > > - possibility to mount ext2 (so, possibility to use an older kernel, or to
> > > repair a system, etc)
> >
> > Yes, but these really only apply to an Upgrade installation. On a brand
> > new hard drive why should either of these matter?
>
>
--- David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For me, it's usually just for workstation use, but I'm glad to see
> journaling as I have had ext2 crash so many times and have lost so much
> data that I'm glad if we can finally put an end to all of that.
I guess you mean **you** have crashed your
David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7 Sep 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>
> > ext3 has two very important advantage :
> >
> > - flawless migration from ext2
> >
> > - possibility to mount ext2 (so, possibility to use an older kernel, or to
> > repair a system, etc)
>
> Yes, but
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> ResierFS is the most efficient in handling large number of small files.
> So you'd want to put your Oracle DB on XFS but your Squid cache on
> Reiser (but beware, I have seen surveys that indicate that ext3
> sometimes behaves better that reiser for s
On 7 Sep 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> ext3 has two very important advantage :
>
> - flawless migration from ext2
>
> - possibility to mount ext2 (so, possibility to use an older kernel, or to
> repair a system, etc)
Yes, but these really only apply to an Upgrade installation. On a brand
Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > We have fairly tested and benchmarked it
> some indiscretions concerning the benchmarks ?
XFS works. we haven't finished yet. see with civileme about that.
> And what about the JFS case ? things have been fixed ?
Not well, we working on that.
Le Vendredi 7 Septembre 2001 16:16, Chmouel Boudjnah scribit :
> Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > to whether or not these changes are a problem?
> >
> > Too late anyway :-)
>
> We have fairly tested and benchmarked it
some indiscretions concerning the benchmarks ?
And what a
David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ReiserFS, and I don't plan on using ext3, because the reason for its use
> is only a political one. RedHat and the kernel developers are guilty of
> this, and Mandrake ais s well. Until ext3 is stable and starts winning on
> some benchmark tests why sho
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > to whether or not these changes are a problem?
> Too late anyway :-)
We have fairly tested and benchmarked it
>
> > what ?
> > I believed that there was too many changes in the core kernel ? or
are
> we
> > going to have 3 kernel ? kernel2-2.2.19 kernel-2.4.8-xymdk and
> > kernel-xfs-2.4.8zmdk ?
> >
> > If we got 3 kernel, are you going to find enough place to put
everything
> in
> > it ?
>
> Yes, I kno
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Xfsprogs now in RPMS. Does it mean we now officially support xfs? Will
> it be included in kernel then?
* Fri Sep 07 2001 Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.4.8-21mdk
- Add XFS support (P4600, P4601) (R.Cattelan).
--
Guillaume Cottenceau -
David Walluck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> reason to be politics. And since Mandrake chooses ext3 simply because
> RedHat does (RedHat compatibility), then they are guilty of these same
> politics.
we don't choose anything we give the choice. The advantage of ext3
actually is a technique point,
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
> what ?
> I believed that there was too many changes in the core kernel ? or are we
> going to have 3 kernel ? kernel2-2.2.19 kernel-2.4.8-xymdk and
> kernel-xfs-2.4.8zmdk ?
>
> If we got 3 kernel, are you going to find enough place to put everything in
Fabrice FACORAT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> what ?
> I believed that there was too many changes in the core kernel ? or are we
we worked with the XFS developers about that to make it safe and
clean, and we have great support from theses guys.
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wow! When? Comes it in 8.1 as well?
Now, just upload, 8.1 as well.
Le Vendredi 7 Septembre 2001 15:12, Chmouel Boudjnah scribit :
> Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Xfsprogs now in RPMS. Does it mean we now officially support xfs? Will
> > it be included in kernel then?
>
> yep.
what ?
I believed that there was too many changes in the core kernel
>
> > Xfsprogs now in RPMS. Does it mean we now officially support xfs?
Will
> > it be included in kernel then?
>
> yep.
Wow! When? Comes it in 8.1 as well?
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Xfsprogs now in RPMS. Does it mean we now officially support xfs? Will
> it be included in kernel then?
yep.
Xfsprogs now in RPMS. Does it mean we now officially support xfs? Will
it be included in kernel then?
-andrej
20 matches
Mail list logo
