James Sparenberg wrote:
Mine reads
[EMAIL PROTECTED]8d[EMAIL
PROTECTED]85±hî^Lu¤hÃ82e9aL8d92ï¾n\Ã^Xô^_æüÃX
ÃV;R099I^Sþ84Ãçþ\á!Ã.dÃ
Ãx'áR9a°^Q(·6Ã.Ãù9e½Â
æ]82Ãüt8f$¢äó^R^X8cÃ^_°LüQï©94Ãm®ÃQi¸Ã¤9KøãÃ84ÃYB®^Z=G*(Ãmrº^U±éJÃt:%ÃÃ
996î95Ãt8bÃt^F%%
]«9cÃ^[9
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No idea on the second point. On the first point the answer currently is
no; Mandrake stuck ACPI in the kernel but don't appear to have made any
attempt at getting the appropriate
should be done shortly..
modules loaded automatically. Which is dumb
On 22 Feb 2003, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 22:45, Buchan Milne wrote:
[snip]
I get the feeling if someone would just write some damn *documentation*
for the current ACPI implementation we'd find out all sorts of cool
things it does. As it stands, anyone who isn't a
: Monday, February 24, 2003 1:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] ACPI Testing
Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No idea on the second point. On the first point the answer currently
is no; Mandrake stuck ACPI in the kernel but don't appear to have made
any attempt at getting
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 18:35, MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote:
You can't just put the names of the modules to load in the file. At least it
didn't work for me. Can you supply the correct syntax? As it stands I just
wrote a startup script that insmods the modules at boot...
Well, that works
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 10:52, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 18:35, MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote:
You can't just put the names of the modules to load in the file. At least it
didn't work for me. Can you supply the correct syntax? As it stands I just
wrote a startup
Jack Coates wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 19:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 22:45, Buchan Milne wrote:
Do not know. I am using acpi on my IBM 600X, which seems to work ok,
except that I do not see any benefit over APM (bseides the fact that I can
view temperatures and charge in
On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 00:10, Randy Welch wrote:
Jack Coates wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 19:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 22:45, Buchan Milne wrote:
Do not know. I am using acpi on my IBM 600X, which seems to work ok,
except that I do not see any benefit over APM
On Sat, 2003-02-22 at 00:10, Randy Welch wrote:
...
If you had a modern laptop, you'd be happy to get that because it
wouldn't happen without ACPI :-)
What's classed as a modern laptop? ;-)
I have an A22p that won't suspend with ACPI loaded up ( and I have to
load it up by hand ).
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote:
I have been testing MDK on an HP Omnibook XE 4500. So far I have gotten the
ACPI stuff to work and the battery monitor applet runs good. However, I had
to manually insmod the ACPI modules. Is there a way to do that through a
GUI? What
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 22:45, Buchan Milne wrote:
Do not know. I am using acpi on my IBM 600X, which seems to work ok,
except that I do not see any benefit over APM (bseides the fact that I can
view temperatures and charge in mWh). Am I supposed to see my machine
suspend automatically (it does
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 19:48, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 22:45, Buchan Milne wrote:
Do not know. I am using acpi on my IBM 600X, which seems to work ok,
except that I do not see any benefit over APM (bseides the fact that I can
view temperatures and charge in mWh). Am I
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 19:07, MEISCH,CORY (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote:
I have been testing MDK on an HP Omnibook XE 4500. So far I have
gotten the ACPI stuff to work and the battery monitor applet runs
good. However, I had to manually insmod the ACPI modules. Is there a
way to do that through a
13 matches
Mail list logo
